2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coatings of active and heat-resistant cobalt-aluminium xerogel catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing Ni-CeO2-ZrO2 and NiO-Al2O3 coated on Al [22] and Ni [30] foams, respectively, with their pelletized bed counterparts, a lower temperature increase in the bed is observed for the structured catalysts, while the productivity or activity is similar than for pelletized catalysts. In some cases, the amount of catalyst in the coating may be responsible for the low activity, as reported for NiCrAl foams (450 to 1200 μm cell size, 130 to 45 ppi) coated by a Co-Al2O3 xerogel [31]. Actually, Ricca et al reported that an Al foam coated by a 5 wt.% Ni/CeO2-ZrO2 catalyst outperforms a pelletized catalyst due to a more effective heat transfer from warmer to colder areas in the bed [32]; however, in comparison to a SiC honeycomb monolith, it shows a lower heat transfer due to the lower effective thermal conductivity of the foam, which is made by large pores (20 ppi Al foam).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…By comparing Ni-CeO2-ZrO2 and NiO-Al2O3 coated on Al [22] and Ni [30] foams, respectively, with their pelletized bed counterparts, a lower temperature increase in the bed is observed for the structured catalysts, while the productivity or activity is similar than for pelletized catalysts. In some cases, the amount of catalyst in the coating may be responsible for the low activity, as reported for NiCrAl foams (450 to 1200 μm cell size, 130 to 45 ppi) coated by a Co-Al2O3 xerogel [31]. Actually, Ricca et al reported that an Al foam coated by a 5 wt.% Ni/CeO2-ZrO2 catalyst outperforms a pelletized catalyst due to a more effective heat transfer from warmer to colder areas in the bed [32]; however, in comparison to a SiC honeycomb monolith, it shows a lower heat transfer due to the lower effective thermal conductivity of the foam, which is made by large pores (20 ppi Al foam).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In terms of stability, particularly for high temperature reactions, xerogel catalysts are a promising, yet seldom investigated alternative as compared to impregnated and precipitated catalysts. The homogenous sol‐gel approach allows a strong interaction of the support and the active component due to a partial encapsulation usually resulting in a high sinter stability …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%