2014
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coaxial wet-spun yarn supercapacitors for high-energy density and safe wearable electronics

Abstract: Yarn supercapacitors have great potential in future portable and wearable electronics because of their tiny volume, flexibility and weavability. However, low-energy density limits their development in the area of wearable high-energy density devices. How to enhance their energy densities while retaining their high-power densities is a critical challenge for yarn supercapacitor development. Here we propose a coaxial wet-spinning assembly approach to continuously spin polyelectrolyte-wrapped graphene/carbon nano… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

19
768
5
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,055 publications
(795 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
19
768
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific areal capacitance of our solid‐state fiber device with PVA/KOH electrolyte at 0.41 mA cm −2 is ≈2–350 times of previously reported solid‐state fiber SCs measured at much lower rates (typically 0.01–0.1 mA cm −2 ) reported so far (see Table S1, Supporting Information) 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36. More importantly, both the areal energy and power densities of 18.83 µWh cm −2 and 16.33 mW cm −2 based on the device (75.32 µWh cm −2 and 65.32 mW cm −2 based on one electrode) are substantially higher than those of previous advanced fiber devices using hollow rGO/PEDOT: PSS fiber (6.8 µWh cm −2 , 0.166 mW cm −2 ),30 rGO/MnO 2 /PPy@metal yarn (9.2 µWh cm −2 , 1.5 mW cm −2 ),31 MnO 2 /CNT fiber (8.5 µWh cm −2 ),20 PPy@CNTs@urethane elastic fibers (6.13 µWh cm −2 , 0.133 mW cm −2 ),26 GO/CNT@carboxymethyl cellulose fibers (3.84 µWh cm −2 , 0.19 mW cm −2 ),5 and nanoporous Au wire@MnO 2 //CNT/carbon fibers (5.4 µWh cm −2 , 2.53 mW cm −2 ) 36. To our knowledge, the areal energy and power densities for our prototype device represent the highest values among all solid‐state symmetric fiber SCs (Table S1, Supporting Information).…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The specific areal capacitance of our solid‐state fiber device with PVA/KOH electrolyte at 0.41 mA cm −2 is ≈2–350 times of previously reported solid‐state fiber SCs measured at much lower rates (typically 0.01–0.1 mA cm −2 ) reported so far (see Table S1, Supporting Information) 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36. More importantly, both the areal energy and power densities of 18.83 µWh cm −2 and 16.33 mW cm −2 based on the device (75.32 µWh cm −2 and 65.32 mW cm −2 based on one electrode) are substantially higher than those of previous advanced fiber devices using hollow rGO/PEDOT: PSS fiber (6.8 µWh cm −2 , 0.166 mW cm −2 ),30 rGO/MnO 2 /PPy@metal yarn (9.2 µWh cm −2 , 1.5 mW cm −2 ),31 MnO 2 /CNT fiber (8.5 µWh cm −2 ),20 PPy@CNTs@urethane elastic fibers (6.13 µWh cm −2 , 0.133 mW cm −2 ),26 GO/CNT@carboxymethyl cellulose fibers (3.84 µWh cm −2 , 0.19 mW cm −2 ),5 and nanoporous Au wire@MnO 2 //CNT/carbon fibers (5.4 µWh cm −2 , 2.53 mW cm −2 ) 36. To our knowledge, the areal energy and power densities for our prototype device represent the highest values among all solid‐state symmetric fiber SCs (Table S1, Supporting Information).…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…However, the major bottleneck for the existing fiber m‐SCs lies in their much lower areal energy density relative to routine planar SCs8 or batteries 2. In this context, considerable efforts were concentrated on exploring proper fiber electrode materials with large capacitance for improving the energy density, while maintaining high power density 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. Various carbonaceous materials like activated carbon,9, 10 carbon nanotubes (CNTs),11, 12, 13 reduced graphene oxide (rGO),14, 15, 16 and our recently developed rGO/CNT hybrids17, 18 were exploited as active materials for fiber m‐SCs, yet their applications are restricted by the low capacitance of <200 mF cm −2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Typically used active materials are carbon nanoparticles, metal oxides, and conducting polymers 144, 149, 150, 151. Several device architectures have been developed for yarn supercapacitor, such as biscrolled or two‐ply yarn, multi‐ply yarn, braided, core–shell, and coaxial yarns 134, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156…”
Section: Fiber‐shaped Energy Storage Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%