The molecular nanocluster
[Ni
36–
x
Pd
5+
x
(CO)
46
]
6–
(
x
=
0.41) (
1
6–
) was obtained
from the reaction of [NMe
3
(CH
2
Ph)]
2
[Ni
6
(CO)
12
] with 0.8
molar equivalent of [Pd(CH
3
CN)
4
][BF
4
]
2
in tetrahydrofuran (thf). In contrast, [Ni
37–
x
Pd
7+
x
(CO)
48
]
6–
(
x
= 0.69) (
2
6–
) and [HNi
37–
x
Pd
7+
x
(CO)
48
]
5–
(
x
= 0.53) (
3
5–
) were obtained from the reactions
of [NBu
4
]
2
[Ni
6
(CO)
12
]
with 0.9–1.0 molar equivalent of [Pd(CH
3
CN)
4
][BF
4
]
2
in thf. After workup,
3
5–
was extracted in acetone,
whereas
2
6–
was soluble
in CH
3
CN. The total structures of
1
6–
,
2
6–
, and
3
5–
were
determined with atomic precision by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.
Their metal cores adopted cubic close packed structures and displayed
both substitutional and compositional disorder, in light of the fact
that some positions could be occupied by either Ni or Pd. The redox
behavior of these new Ni–Pd molecular alloy nanoclusters was
investigated by cyclic voltammetry and in situ infrared spectroelectrochemistry.
All three compounds
1
6–
,
2
6–
, and
3
5–
displayed several reversible redox
processes and behaved as electron sinks and molecular nanocapacitors.
Moreover, to gain insight into the factors that affect the current–potential
profiles, cyclic voltammograms were recorded at both Pt and glassy
carbon working electrodes and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
experiments performed for the first time on molecular carbonyl nanoclusters.