2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-011-1510-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cobalt oxide nanostructure-modified glassy carbon electrode as a highly sensitive flow injection amperometric sensor for the picomolar detection of insulin

Abstract: Glassy carbon electrode modified with electrodeposited cobalt oxide nanostructure shows an excellent electrocatalytic activity toward insulin oxidation at a wide pH range. Cyclic voltammetry, hydrodynamic amperometry, and flow injection analysis (FIA) were used for insulin determination at a picomolar and higher-concentration range. Amperometric determination of insulin at this modified electrode yielded a calibration curve with the following characteristics; linear range, 100 pM-15 nM; sensitivity of 83.9 nA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this approach has been shown to necessitate specially modied electrode surfaces to retain the insulin stability and electron transfer property with the electrode surface. [10][11][12][13][14] Mediated electrochemical oxidation of insulin in buffer by different modied electrodes consisting of metal oxide particles (osmium, ruthenium, iridium, cobalt, and nickel oxide), [14][15][16][17][18][19] carbon nanotubes, 20 ruthenium oxide-nanotubes, 21 rutheniummetallodendrimer multilayers, 22 chitosan plus MWCNTs, 23 silica gel, 24 silicon-carbide nanoparticles, 25 and Ni-powder 12 have been reported. Most of these modications yielded a detection limit in the nM range, and a few studies detected the pM concentration for mediated insulin oxidation in buffer solutions (please see ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this approach has been shown to necessitate specially modied electrode surfaces to retain the insulin stability and electron transfer property with the electrode surface. [10][11][12][13][14] Mediated electrochemical oxidation of insulin in buffer by different modied electrodes consisting of metal oxide particles (osmium, ruthenium, iridium, cobalt, and nickel oxide), [14][15][16][17][18][19] carbon nanotubes, 20 ruthenium oxide-nanotubes, 21 rutheniummetallodendrimer multilayers, 22 chitosan plus MWCNTs, 23 silica gel, 24 silicon-carbide nanoparticles, 25 and Ni-powder 12 have been reported. Most of these modications yielded a detection limit in the nM range, and a few studies detected the pM concentration for mediated insulin oxidation in buffer solutions (please see ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these modications yielded a detection limit in the nM range, and a few studies detected the pM concentration for mediated insulin oxidation in buffer solutions (please see ref. 14 for details of the electrochemical method used, detection limit and sensitivity parameters of the described electrochemical buffer insulin sensors 12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] ). In addition, electrochemical insulin detection under extreme acidic or basic pH conditions with enzymes or chemical labels has been shown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present work E p linearly depends on the logarithm of the scan rate in the range of 10-100 mVs −1 according to the equation 5: E p = 0.0127 ln ν + 0.6931 (r 2 = 0.9900) [5] From eq. 4 and 5, one obtains:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the electrochemical detection of insulin at most of the unmodified electrodes is limited by the slow oxidation kinetics, which results in surface fouling associated with the accumulation of reaction products, and hence, decreases the selectivity and operational lifetime of the sensor. A traditional solution to these problems is to modify the electrode with appropriate compounds [2,12] or use of mediators [13] The increasing use of nanomaterials in recent years has led to substantial improvements in the efficiency of insulin electrochemical sensor. A wide range of nanomaterials, including cobalt oxide nanostructure [12], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [5,7] nickel nanoparticles [14], guanine/nickel oxide nanoparticles [15], nickel oxide nanoparticles-MWCNTs [16], RuOx/CNTs nanocomposite [17], silicon carbide nanoparticles [8], nanocarbon black electrode surface [18], CNTs-nickel-cobaltoxide nanocomposite [10] and silica nanoparticle [11] have been used to accelerate the kinetics of insulin oxidation and to minimize the fouling of the sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%