2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2017.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cobaltocenium substituents as electron acceptors in photosynthetic model dyads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29,30,35 The molecular design of our compounds (Scheme 1a) is such that about 2.0 eV are stored (in CH 3 CN) in the nal CSS aer absorption of a single visible photon (energies of the photons used for excitation, 2.6 to 3.0 eV). A comparison with CSS energies of other triads revealed that the stored energy typically amounts to about 1.5 eV upon visible light excitation, [9][10][11][12]36 and in two recent CSS studies stored energies between 1.7 and 1.8 eV were declared as highly energetic. 4,5 Recently, we reported on the distance dependence of thermal charge recombination in the compounds from Scheme 1a in comparison to two series of other molecular triads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30,35 The molecular design of our compounds (Scheme 1a) is such that about 2.0 eV are stored (in CH 3 CN) in the nal CSS aer absorption of a single visible photon (energies of the photons used for excitation, 2.6 to 3.0 eV). A comparison with CSS energies of other triads revealed that the stored energy typically amounts to about 1.5 eV upon visible light excitation, [9][10][11][12]36 and in two recent CSS studies stored energies between 1.7 and 1.8 eV were declared as highly energetic. 4,5 Recently, we reported on the distance dependence of thermal charge recombination in the compounds from Scheme 1a in comparison to two series of other molecular triads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron-poor metallocenes such as Cp 2 Ti­(CCR) 2 or [Cp 2 Co] + (Cc + ) , were successfully incorporated as electron acceptors in CT systems. Compared to the ubiquitous Fc/Fc + couple, the Cc/Cc + couple has been less often employed in CT and PET schemes. ,, This underdeveloped attention is certainly due to the more difficult and less established substitution chemistry of Cc + . Only in the last years have the groups of Bildstein and Heck put forward reliable routes toward important Cc + key building blocks, such as [Cc-Br] + , [Cc-NO 2 ] + , [Cc-N 3 ] + , [Cc-COOH] + , or [Cc-NH 2 ] + . , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cobaltoceniumi ons [7] or gold(III) porphyrins [8][9][10] (Scheme 1a) constitute ac lass of artificial cationic electron acceptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferrocene, carotenoid polyenes, and zinc(II) porphyrins represent typical electron‐donor entities whereas quinones, (natural acceptors) or fullerenes,, act as electron acceptors. Cobaltocenium ions or gold(III) porphyrins (Scheme a) constitute a class of artificial cationic electron acceptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%