1993
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-56602-3_140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COBBIT—A control procedure for COBWEB in the presence of concept drift

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the robustness of concept formation systems in the presence of concept drift. By concept drift is meant that the intension of a concept is not stable during the period of learning, a restriction which is otherwise often imposed. The work is based upon the architecture of COBWEB, an incremental, probabilistic conceptual clustering system. When incrementally and sequentially exposed to the extensions of a set of concepts, COBWEB retains all examples, disregards the age of a concept a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work presented here relates to incremental or on-line concept learning, which has recently received considerable attention among theoreticians (e.g., Angluin, 1988;Maass, 1991;Helmbold, Littlestone, & Long, 1992) as well as practitioners (e.g., Schlimmer & Granger, 1986;Langley, Gennari, & Iba, 1987;Kilander & Jansson, 1993;Kubat, 1989Kubat, , 1993Salganicoff, 1993a;Widmer & Kubat, 1993), The principal task is to learn a concept incrementally by processing labeled training examples one at a time. From another point of view, the problem may be seen as minimizing the total number of erroneous classifications in a feedback system: a stream of objects are classified, one by one, as positive or negative instances of a concept, and immediately afterwards the correct answer is received.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work presented here relates to incremental or on-line concept learning, which has recently received considerable attention among theoreticians (e.g., Angluin, 1988;Maass, 1991;Helmbold, Littlestone, & Long, 1992) as well as practitioners (e.g., Schlimmer & Granger, 1986;Langley, Gennari, & Iba, 1987;Kilander & Jansson, 1993;Kubat, 1989Kubat, , 1993Salganicoff, 1993a;Widmer & Kubat, 1993), The principal task is to learn a concept incrementally by processing labeled training examples one at a time. From another point of view, the problem may be seen as minimizing the total number of erroneous classifications in a feedback system: a stream of objects are classified, one by one, as positive or negative instances of a concept, and immediately afterwards the correct answer is received.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But none of these systems can actually discard old, harmful information, and none of them explicitly stores previous concept descriptions. However, recent work on modified versions of COBWEB (Kilander & Jansson, 1993) is very mush related to our approach and seems to yield very promising results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational learning theory has also investigated the problem (Hembold & Long, 1994;Kuh et al, 1991). In unsupervised learning, the system COBBIT (Kilander & Jansson, 1993) warrants some mention.…”
Section: Previous Work Handling Concept Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%