1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15227.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cocaine‐induced microvascular vasoconstriction but differential systemic haemodynamic responses in Yucatan versus Yorkshire varieties of swine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These new MCE data in humans also extend previous animal studies in several important ways. Our data: a) are consistent with earlier studies in anesthetized dogs 41-43 and pigs 44-46 showing decreased coronary blood flow, and decreased myocardial perfusion by Thallium scintography 47 as well as conventional (i.e., radiolabelled) microspheres 41, 47, 48 ; but b) differ at first glance from more recent studies in conscious dogs and non-human primates in which proximal coronary artery flow increased with cocaine (suggesting that the decreased flow in earlier studies was an artifact of anesthesia). 49 In the later study, however, coronary sinus pH fell despite increased large artery flow, suggesting impaired microvascular perfusion— which we have now shown directly in conscious humans.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These new MCE data in humans also extend previous animal studies in several important ways. Our data: a) are consistent with earlier studies in anesthetized dogs 41-43 and pigs 44-46 showing decreased coronary blood flow, and decreased myocardial perfusion by Thallium scintography 47 as well as conventional (i.e., radiolabelled) microspheres 41, 47, 48 ; but b) differ at first glance from more recent studies in conscious dogs and non-human primates in which proximal coronary artery flow increased with cocaine (suggesting that the decreased flow in earlier studies was an artifact of anesthesia). 49 In the later study, however, coronary sinus pH fell despite increased large artery flow, suggesting impaired microvascular perfusion— which we have now shown directly in conscious humans.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It has been suggested that the coronary artery is more sensitive to endogenous vasoactive substances after chronic cocaine abuse (Jones and Tackett, 1990). Cocaine abuse has been reported to cause an increase in coronary artery vasoconstriction (Vongpatanasin et al, 1997) and recurrent coronary vasoconstriction (Brogan et al, 1992), a decrease in coronary blood flow (Miao et al, 1996), and an increase in myocardial ischemia and infarction (Pitts et al, 1997). Although acute cocaine use is typically considered as a risk factor for acute cardiac events, chronic use may contribute to the development or rapid progression of coronary artery diseases (Wilson, 1998;He et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibitory effect of cocaine on ventricular function may result from sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction or from its direct negative chronotropic and inotropic actions. Although, cocaine can cause coronary spasm and reduce coronary blood flow (8,9), studies (20,(31)(32)(33)(34) reported that +dP/dt fell after cocaine administration whereas coronary blood flow was either unchanged or actually increased. Doses of 0-50 mg/kg cocaine were found to reduce left ventricular function without inducing coronary spasm and increasing systemic vascular resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have reported a significant influence of cocaine administration on cardiovascular function in pigs, dogs, ferrets and rats (5)(6)(7). Nunez and Morgan (8,9) reported that acute or chronic cocaine exposure induced microvascular vasoconstriction and produced myocardial ischemia and infarction. Stambler et al (10) reported that, in conscious dogs, cocaine showed a biphasic effect on blood pressure, first causing transient depression followed by enhanced left ventricular function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%