1992
DOI: 10.1159/000276285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cochlear Function after Stapedectomy

Abstract: The short-term and long-term results of stapedectomy for eliminating the conductive element and improving the hearing in patients with otosclerosis are highly satisfactory all over the world. The delayed sensorineural hearing loss which continues after successful stapedectomy may be due to the operation itself or due to the natural history of the disease. The study was conducted on 80 patients with unilateral stapedectomy with a minimal follow-up period of 1 year. We found that bone conduction values at each f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Short and medium term surveys, predominantly concerned with these problems, did not find any significant hearing deterioration of sensorineural nature (within the limits of the follow-up period, which varied between 1 and 8 years) (8,9). 4 s the follow-up period became longer, reports became more divergent: a tendency to slight, apparently progressive, sensorineural deterioration was observed by some investigators while no significant deterioration was revealed by others (10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Short and medium term surveys, predominantly concerned with these problems, did not find any significant hearing deterioration of sensorineural nature (within the limits of the follow-up period, which varied between 1 and 8 years) (8,9). 4 s the follow-up period became longer, reports became more divergent: a tendency to slight, apparently progressive, sensorineural deterioration was observed by some investigators while no significant deterioration was revealed by others (10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%