Cochlear implantation for tinnitus in adults with bilateral hearing loss: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Assouly, Kelly K. S.; Smit, A.L.; Stegeman, Inge; Rhebergen, Koenraad S.; Dijk, Bas van; Stokroos, Robert J.

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043288

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Implantation is now available to a broader group of individuals compared to when implants were first introduced in the 70's. Individuals are now more commonly implanted with a CI system when they suffer from unilateral deafness (Carlson et al, 2018), or intractable tinnitus (Assouly et al, 2021), and in the presence of increasing amounts of residual hearing (Varadarajan et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How can we compare CI systems across manufacturers? A scoping review of recent literature

Tzvi

Keck

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electric stimulation via a Cochlear Implant (CI) enables people with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss to regain speech understanding and music appreciation and thus allowing them to actively engage in social life. Three main manufacturers (Cochlear, MED-EL and Advanced Bionics) have been offering CI systems, thus challenging CI recipients and Otolaryngologists with a difficult decision, as currently no comprehensive overview or meta-analyses on performance outcome following CI implantation is available. The main goal of this scoping review is to provide evidence that data and standardized speech and music performance tests are available for performing such comparisons. To this end, a literature search was conducted to find studies that address speech and music outcomes in CI recipients. From a total of 1592 papers, 188 paper abstracts were analyzed and 147 articles were found suitable for examination of full text. From which, 42 studies were included for synthesis. A total of 16 studies used the consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition test in quiet at 60db SPL. We found that aside from technical comparisons, only very few publications compare speech outcomes across manufacturers of CI systems. Evidence suggests though, that these data are available in large CI centers in Germany and US. Future studies should therefore leverage large data cohorts to perform such comparisons that could provide critical evaluation criteria and assist both CI recipients and Otolaryngologists to make informed performance-based decisions.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How can we compare CI systems across manufacturers? A scoping review of recent literature

Tzvi

Keck

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Implantation is now available to a broader group of individuals compared to when implants were first introduced in the 1970s. Individuals are now more commonly implanted with a CI system when they suffer from unilateral deafness [8] or intractable tinnitus [9], and in the presence of increasing amounts of residual hearing [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Can We Compare Cochlear Implant Systems across Manufacturers? A Scoping Review of Recent Literature

Tzvi-Minker,

Keck

2023

Audiology Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electric stimulation via a cochlear implant (CI) enables people with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss to regain speech understanding and music appreciation and, thus, allow them to actively engage in social life. Three main manufacturers (CochlearTM, MED-ELTM, and Advanced BionicsTM “AB”) have been offering CI systems, thus challenging CI recipients and otolaryngologists with a difficult decision as currently no comprehensive overview or meta-analysis on performance outcomes following CI implantation is available. The main goals of this scoping review were to (1) map the literature on speech and music performance outcomes and to (2) find whether studies have performed outcome comparisons between devices of different manufacturers. To this end, a literature search was conducted to find studies that address speech and music outcomes in CI recipients. From a total of 1592 papers, 188 paper abstracts were analyzed and 147 articles were found suitable for an examination of full text. From these, 42 studies were included for synthesis. A total of 16 studies used the consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition test in quiet at 60 db SPL. We found that aside from technical comparisons, very few publications compared speech outcomes across manufacturers of CI systems. However, evidence suggests that these data are available in large CI centers in Germany and the US. Future studies should therefore leverage large data cohorts to perform such comparisons, which could provide critical evaluation criteria and assist both CI recipients and otolaryngologists to make informed performance-based decisions.

show abstract

Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward cochlear implants among deaf patients who received cochlear implants

Li,

Zhou,

Zheng

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the growing use of cochlear implants in deaf patients, there is a lack of data on their knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward cochlear implants. This study aimed to investigate the KAP toward cochlear implants among deaf patients who received cochlear implants. A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2022 and December 2022 among deaf patients who had received cochlear implants. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic characteristics and KAP scores. A total of 526 participants were enrolled; 54.18% were female, 65.40% were above 60 years old, and 61.03% were surveyed at less than 3 years after implantation. The mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 8.15 ± 2.18 (possible range: 0–10), 43.63 ± 6.98 (possible range: 12–60), and 41.11 ± 7.42 (possible range: 11–55), respectively, indicating good knowledge, moderate attitude and practice. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that attitude [odd ratio (OR) = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18–1.29, P < 0.001] and unemployment (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.17–0.63, P = 0.001) were independently associated with practice. Path analysis showed that knowledge directly influenced attitude (β = 0.93, 95% CI 0.61–1.19, P < 0.001), attitude directly influenced practice (β = 0.53, 95% CI 0.46–0.61, P < 0.001), and knowledge directly (β = 0.77, 95% CI 0.53–1.01, P < 0.001) and indirectly (β = 0.50, 95% CI 0.34–0.66, P < 0.001) influenced practice. Deaf patients who received cochlear implants showed good knowledge, moderate attitude and practice toward cochlear implants. Knowledge should be strengthened to improve attitude and practice toward cochlear implants, which could translate into realistic expectations toward cochlear implants devices and proper care and maintenance.

show abstract

Cochlear implantation for tinnitus in adults with bilateral hearing loss: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Cited by 4 publications

References 43 publications

How can we compare CI systems across manufacturers? A scoping review of recent literature

How can we compare CI systems across manufacturers? A scoping review of recent literature

How Can We Compare Cochlear Implant Systems across Manufacturers? A Scoping Review of Recent Literature

Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward cochlear implants among deaf patients who received cochlear implants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About