2007
DOI: 10.1097/mlg.0b013e31806009c9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cochlear Implantation in Children With CHARGE Syndrome: Therapeutic Decisions and Outcomes

Abstract: Careful treatment planning for children with sensorineural hearing loss and CHARGE syndrome can lead to varying, but limited degrees, of auditory benefit with no increase in surgical complications. Although the implant enhanced the children's 'connectivity' to the environment, it did not promote the development of oral language skills in this population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The underdeveloped vestibulum found by Satar et al [6] and Morimoto et al [7] further underlines the fact that the pars superior is affected. Reports in the literature [8] of SCC aplasia or CHARGE syndrome (58% co-incidence in our collection, 60% in that of Satar et al [6]) normally recommend cochlear implantation for these patients (CHARGE is a syndrome involving coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, mental retardation, genitourinary and ear anomalies). Three patients with cochlear nerve aplasia and coexisting SCC aplasia responded to auditory stimuli, despite the non-visibility of the cochlear nerve (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The underdeveloped vestibulum found by Satar et al [6] and Morimoto et al [7] further underlines the fact that the pars superior is affected. Reports in the literature [8] of SCC aplasia or CHARGE syndrome (58% co-incidence in our collection, 60% in that of Satar et al [6]) normally recommend cochlear implantation for these patients (CHARGE is a syndrome involving coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, mental retardation, genitourinary and ear anomalies). Three patients with cochlear nerve aplasia and coexisting SCC aplasia responded to auditory stimuli, despite the non-visibility of the cochlear nerve (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Three patients with cochlear nerve aplasia and coexisting SCC aplasia responded to auditory stimuli, despite the non-visibility of the cochlear nerve (17). Lanson et al [8] reported on 10 implanted patients with CHARGE syndrome, all of whom showed varying but limited degrees of auditory benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The challenges with CI described in our case study for a subject with KS may be applicable to individuals with CHARGE syndrome who are eligible for CI. In other words, both groups have handicaps in addition to hearing loss, and both groups have intellectual disabilities and anomalies of the petrosal bone [10] . Given the similarity between the groups and the lack of research on CI in KS, studies investigating CI in individuals with CHARGE syndrome could aid in clinical decision making when it comes to implantation in subjects with KS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a larger number of criteria will usually influence the decision as to whether these patients should undergo cochlear implantation (CI). Evaluation of children with a CI who also have CHARGE syndrome demonstrates varying but limited degrees of auditory benefit [10]. There is a consensus in the literature that these children benefit; however, realistic expectations have to be discussed with parents beforehand.…”
Section: Hypoplasia and Aplasia Of The Vestibulocochlear Nerve (Vcn)mentioning
confidence: 99%