Cochlear Implants: Evaluation of Effects of Various Parameters on Outcomes in Pediatric Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre for Unilateral Ear Implantation

Sharma, Shivam; Solanki, Bharti; Solanki, Yogesh; Kaurani, Yogesh

doi:10.1007/s12070-020-02129-9

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Trained professionals administer the evaluation by prompting parents with questions, and responses involve describing specific cases, offering evidence of auditory speech recovery. This approach helps avoid the potential bias of direct “yes” or “no” responses, contributing to a more objective assessment ( 29 ). In this analysis, two studies utilized the PEACH score, and the results indicated no significant differences in postoperative telephone scores, quiet environment scores, and noise environment scores.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory and speech outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Waardenburg syndrome: a meta-analysis

Qin,

Guo,

Yin

et al. 2024

Front. Neurol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis study aims to assess the potential efficacy of cochlear implantation as a treatment for patients with Waardenburg syndrome (WS) and to guide clinical work by comparing the effect of auditory and speech recovery after cochlear implantation in patients with WS and non-WS.MethodsPubMed, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data were sources for retrieving literature on cochlear implantation in WS, and clinical data meeting the inclusion criteria were meta-analyzed using RevMan5.41.ResultsA total of nine articles were included in this study, including 132 patients with WS and 815 patients in the control group. Meta-analysis showed that there are no significant differences in the scores for categories of audit performance (CAP), speech intelligibility rating (SIR), and parents’ evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) between the WS group and the control group.ConclusionCochlear implantation demonstrates comparable auditory and speech recovery outcomes for WS patients and non-WS patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory and speech outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Waardenburg syndrome: a meta-analysis

Qin,

Guo,

Yin

et al. 2024

Front. Neurol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Open access structured rehabilitation programmes to support children in optimising their hearing skills. 3 Ganek et al investigated the language outcomes of individuals who underwent cochlear implantation. The study emphasised that cochlear implantation positively impacts language development in individuals with profound hearing loss.…”

Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They stressed the need for consistent and structured rehabilitation programmes to support children in optimising their hearing skills. 3 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative analysis of story-grammar development: a cross-sectional study of Tamil-speaking child cochlear implant users and hearing peers in Tamil Nadu, India

Muthu,

Venkatraman,

Ganesh

2023

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis cross-sectional comparative study aimed to analyse and compare the story-grammar components in Tamil-speaking children with and without hearing impairment (HI) narratives.DesignThe study used a cross-sectional, comparative design to assess and compare narrative structures.SettingData were collected at the Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research in Chennai, India.Participants30 children participated in the study, including 15 children with severe to profound hearing loss who used cochlear implants and 15 with normal hearing. The participants were language-age-matched children aged 3–5 years, proficient in Tamil.InterventionsNo specific interventions were implemented in this study.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome measures focused on story-grammar components, including settings, characters, initiating events, internal plans, attempts, outcomes, and resolution. These components were evaluated through narrative retellings by the children.ResultsAnalysis of the narratives revealed significant differences between the two groups. Children with normal hearing demonstrated a higher representation of story-grammar elements than children with HI.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that children with normal hearing exhibit a more proficient understanding and utilisation of story structure in their story-telling than children with HI. This study highlights the importance of narrative analysis in language assessment, particularly for children with HI. Tailored interventions incorporating appropriate language stimulation techniques are needed to enhance children’s narrative skills with HI. Further research in this area is warranted.

show abstract

Round Window Visibility in Cochlear Implantation : Pre-operative Prediction Using Various Radiological Parameters

Gupta,

Samdani,

Sharma

et al. 2023

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cochlear Implants: Evaluation of Effects of Various Parameters on Outcomes in Pediatric Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre for Unilateral Ear Implantation

Cited by 6 publications

References 17 publications

Auditory and speech outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Waardenburg syndrome: a meta-analysis

Auditory and speech outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Waardenburg syndrome: a meta-analysis

Comparative analysis of story-grammar development: a cross-sectional study of Tamil-speaking child cochlear implant users and hearing peers in Tamil Nadu, India

Round Window Visibility in Cochlear Implantation : Pre-operative Prediction Using Various Radiological Parameters

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About