2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4939325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cochlear microphonic broad tuning curves

Abstract: Abstract. It is known that the cochlear microphonic voltage exhibits much broader tuning than does the basilar membrane motion. The most commonly used explanation for this is that when an electrode is inserted at a particular point inside the scala media, the microphonic potentials of neighbouring hair cells have different phases, leading to cancelation at the electrodes location. In situ recording of functioning outer hair cells (OHCs) for investigating this hypothesis is exceptionally difficult. Therefore, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was shown in Ayat et al (2015) that longitudinal coupling is not required for the cochlear microphonic to have broad tuning curves; rather the broadness is due to phase cancellation between the hair cell and hair bundle voltages. The shorter range of hair cell electrical influence proposed here is consistent with these earlier observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was shown in Ayat et al (2015) that longitudinal coupling is not required for the cochlear microphonic to have broad tuning curves; rather the broadness is due to phase cancellation between the hair cell and hair bundle voltages. The shorter range of hair cell electrical influence proposed here is consistent with these earlier observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed our model of CM generation with the goal of explaining the various components seen in the data rather than providing a complete account of the many complexities involved in CM generation. The model ignores the complicated electroanatomy of the spiral cochlea and its possible implications for round-window responses (e.g., Dallos 1984;Chertoff et al 2012;Ayat et al 2015). For instance, the spiral shape of the cochlea may affect the effective electrical attenuation factor, which may not be an entirely monotonic function of longitudinal distance (Chertoff et al 2012).…”
Section: Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%