1997
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690430222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cocurrent membrane reactors vs. PFRs for shifting dehydrogenation equilibrium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A high ammonia-to-methanol ratio is known to disfavor TMA production . In the first two cases the key to improved yields of MMA and DMA would be the selective removal of these components. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high ammonia-to-methanol ratio is known to disfavor TMA production . In the first two cases the key to improved yields of MMA and DMA would be the selective removal of these components. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gobina et al (1995a) concluded that radial dispersion effects are negligible for the tube dimension used experimentally. Reo et al (1997), using mass-action kinetics, demonstrated that the yield of a porous membrane reactor offers little or no advantage over a diluted plug-flow reactor, and their simulations exhibit the existence of asymptotic solutions of the type analyzed here. Other studies considered adiabatic operation in which the transported hydrogen reacts with oxygen on the shell side to supply the necessary enthalpy; these studies will be reviewed later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…(Many other studies have defined a conversion based on the total olefin flow in the shell and tube side, and compared it with equilibrium values based on tube-side conditions. As recently noted by Reo et al (1997), such reactors offer no advantage over diluted PFRs). We simulated the reactor for a partially selective membrane, assuming that local equilibrium is maintained everywhere and that n ) 1 (eqs 1-2) and Q B ) Q C ) mQ H , where m is the selectivity parameter and the permeability difference between B and C is ignored.…”
Section: Df D(k′z)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ursachen sind u. a. die Tatsachen, dass ein erfolgreicher Einsatz eine genaue Abstimmung der Geschwindigkeiten der Reaktion und des Stofftransportes erfordert (¹kinetische Kompatibilitätª [52]) und dass die Steigerung des Umsatzes allein nicht immer eine ausreichende Rechtfertigung für den Einsatz eines komplizierteren Prozesses ist [53,54].…”
Section: Membranreaktorenunclassified