2008
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0801.0028
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2006

Peter J. Mohr,
Barry N. Taylor,
David B. Newell

Abstract: This paper gives the 2006 self-consistent set of values of the basic constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) for international use. Further, it describes in detail the adjustment of the values of the constants, including the selection of the final set of input data based on the results of least-squares analyses. The 2006 adjustment takes into account the data considered in the 2002 adjustment as well as the data that bec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
59
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
(246 reference statements)
4
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent publication [1] announced a measurement of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen that seems to require a value of the proton's radius, r p = 0.84184(67) fm, which differs by five standard deviations from the value given in the CODATA compilation [2], r p = 0.8768(69) fm. It is of course possible that the reason for the different values of r p extracted from muonic and electronic hydrogen lies within the standard model, involving subtle QED and/or hadronic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent publication [1] announced a measurement of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen that seems to require a value of the proton's radius, r p = 0.84184(67) fm, which differs by five standard deviations from the value given in the CODATA compilation [2], r p = 0.8768(69) fm. It is of course possible that the reason for the different values of r p extracted from muonic and electronic hydrogen lies within the standard model, involving subtle QED and/or hadronic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between the gravitational constant G 0 ≡ G(q 0 ) ≡ (16πK 0 ) −1 from (2.1) and Newton's constant G N (Cavendish, 1798;Mohr, Taylor & Newell, 2008) is rather subtle, but, in this article, the approximate equality G 0 ∼ G N is simply taken to hold (see the next paragraph for the argument). For these numerical values of the constants η (q 0 ) 3/4 and G 0 , the length scale entering the modified-gravity action term (2.2) has the value L 0 ∼ 10 26 m ∼ 3 Gpc.…”
Section: Additional Remarksmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…( 2.2) of Klinkhamer (2010a), with q replaced by q 0 and changing the sign in front of the φ R term, where φ ∈ (−∞, 1) is the dimensionless Brans-Dicke scalar field. The corresponding potential U(φ) ∝ η 2 /(1 − φ) is such that it leads to the chameleon effect (Khoury & Weltman, 2004) and the effect is taken to be operative for Cavendishtype experiments on Earth (Cavendish, 1798;Mohr, Taylor & Newell, 2008), giving G 0 ∼ G N (see also Endnote [39] in Klinkhamer (2010a) for further discussion).…”
Section: Additional Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it allows for a very precise test of bound-state QED, and can be used to restrict models of physics beyond the Standard Model. Measurements of the ground-state hyperfine splitting of muonium are used to extract the muon to electron mass ratio m µ /m e and the muon to proton magnetic moment ratio µ µ /µ p [1]. The value of µ µ /µ p is required for obtaining the muon anomalous magnetic moment from experiment [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%