“…As can be seen, very few authors evaluate all four of performance metrics for their tool/technique, and nearly a quarter of the publications have no evaluation whatsoever. [40], CBCD [41], CD-Form [42,43], CloneWorks [37], CMGA [44], DuDe [45], DupLoc [25,26], MeCC [46], NiCad [47,48,49,50,51], ScalClone [52], SeByte [53,54,55,56], SimCad [57,58], SourcererCC [59,60,61,62,63], Corazza et al [64], Falke et al [65], Kam1n0 [66], Karus and Kilgi [67], Qu et al [68] x x x 13 BAT [69], CDSW [70], clones/cscope [71], CodeBlast [72], cpdetector [71,73], Dup [21,22,23], JPlag [74], M Q lone [75], SHINOBI [76,77], Simon [78] [96,…”