2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.524755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Code compression for VLIW embedded processors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher compression rates could be achieved for native executables by taking into account the instruction encoding, like done in [17,18]; the reason is that opcodes and registers have different and often uncorrelated dynamics.…”
Section: Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Higher compression rates could be achieved for native executables by taking into account the instruction encoding, like done in [17,18]; the reason is that opcodes and registers have different and often uncorrelated dynamics.…”
Section: Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, it saves 20 -30% of code size. The SlimCode [18] compression technique for ST200 directly compares with CodePack and it achieves an average compression ratio of 40%. [12] compresses Java byte-code by using canonical Huffman codes; no decompression is needed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation