2010
DOI: 10.1145/1805964.1805966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coded aperture projection

Abstract: Coding a projector's aperture plane with adaptive patterns together with inverse filtering allow the depth-of-field of projected imagery to be increased. We present two prototypes and corresponding algorithms for static and programmable apertures. We also explain how these patterns can be computed at interactive rates, by taking into account the image content and limitations of the human visual system. Applications such as projector defocus compensation, high-quality projector depixelation, and increased tempo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above idea of restoring an image by optical convolution is similar to previous work for extending projector depth-of-field [17] and a 2D code using a blur of pattern light [16], but the tasks are different. Idea 2: Physics-in-the-loop (PITL) optimization for designing key aperture and perturbation patterns.…”
Section: Key Ideasmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The above idea of restoring an image by optical convolution is similar to previous work for extending projector depth-of-field [17] and a 2D code using a blur of pattern light [16], but the tasks are different. Idea 2: Physics-in-the-loop (PITL) optimization for designing key aperture and perturbation patterns.…”
Section: Key Ideasmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While constrained iterative optimization can provide highquality compensation [17], the computational complexity becomes a bottleneck. This trade-off between computational complexity and image quality can be addressed by using a coded aperture [41] or a DNN-based technique [19], [42]. All the mentioned methods share a common drawback: they require projecting calibration images and estimating the PSF each time the projection setup changes, making them unsuitable for DPM.…”
Section: Projector Deblurringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other applications for flexible focus imaging include 3D shape reconstruction with shape from (de)focus (see e.g. [NN94,ZLN09]) or Confocal Stereo [HK06,HK09], video matting [MMP*05] and extended DOF projection [GWGB10].…”
Section: Extended Depth Of Field Photographymentioning
confidence: 99%