Proceedings of the 4th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference 2016
DOI: 10.15530/urtec-2016-2461775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Codell Sandstone, a Review of the Northern DJ Basin Oil Resource Play, Laramie County, Wyoming and Weld County, Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective porosity calculated in the Codell was originally calculated to be 16.7%, seen in log track one (blue) of Figure 3.38 at 7,800 ft, however, this is artificially high due to the neutron porosity log reading a high value caused by the gas effect (Nelson et al 1999). This was reduced manually to 12%, seen in log track one of Figure 3.40; a porosity consistent with porosities published in literature (Higley and Cox 2007;Sonnenberg 2015;Sterling et al 2016).…”
Section: Gamma Ray Calibration and Synthetic Gamma Ray Generationsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The effective porosity calculated in the Codell was originally calculated to be 16.7%, seen in log track one (blue) of Figure 3.38 at 7,800 ft, however, this is artificially high due to the neutron porosity log reading a high value caused by the gas effect (Nelson et al 1999). This was reduced manually to 12%, seen in log track one of Figure 3.40; a porosity consistent with porosities published in literature (Higley and Cox 2007;Sonnenberg 2015;Sterling et al 2016).…”
Section: Gamma Ray Calibration and Synthetic Gamma Ray Generationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Figures 3.27 and 3.28, respectively. This is consistent with literature of reservoir pressure found in the DJ Basin where pressure gradients range from 0.45 psi/ft to 0.66 psi/ft in the Niobrara and Codell depending on depths(Sonnenberg 2016;Sterling et al 2016).…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations