1998
DOI: 10.37236/1375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Codes and Projective Multisets

Abstract: The paper gives a matrix-free presentation of the correspondence between full-length linear codes and projective multisets. It generalizes the Brouwer-Van Eupen construction that transforms projective codes into two-weight codes. Short proofs of known theorems are obtained. A new notion of self-duality in coding theory is explored.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We say that the multiset k S and the code C = c∈S Rc are associated. By definition of k S we have |k S | = n. The following theorem is a generalization of a similar result by Dodunekov and Simonis [10] about linear codes over finite fields. Proof.…”
Section: Multisets In Projective Hjelmslev Geometries and Linear Codementioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We say that the multiset k S and the code C = c∈S Rc are associated. By definition of k S we have |k S | = n. The following theorem is a generalization of a similar result by Dodunekov and Simonis [10] about linear codes over finite fields. Proof.…”
Section: Multisets In Projective Hjelmslev Geometries and Linear Codementioning
confidence: 53%
“…Codes over such rings appeared in various contexts in recent coding theory research. In third place, nontrivial linear codes over finite chain rings can be considered as multisets of points in finite projective Hjelmslev geometries thus extending the familiar interpretation of linear codes over finite fields as multisets of points in classical projective geometries PG(k, q) [10]. However, there are some differences between linear codes over finite fields and linear codes over finite chain rings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the corresponding Frobenius number the sharpest upper bound in the binary case q = 2 isF 2 (r) ≤ 2 2r − 2 r−1 − 1. The lengths of projective 2-, 4-divisible and 8-divisible linear binary codes as well as 3-divisible linear ternary codes have been completely determined [14,20], but there are open cases already for (q, ∆) = (2, 16), (3,9), (5,5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the x v are non-negative integers. The conditions (1) and (5) correspond to the restriction that the weights are ∆-divisible and contained in {a∆, . .…”
Section: Appendix a An Alternative Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%