Codesigning sustainable land uses: framing participatory methods for research and development projects

Sachet, Erwan; Mertz, Ole; Vanegas, Martha; Cruz-García, Gisella S.; Beltrán-Tolosa, Lucila Marcela; Angel-Sanchez, Yimi Katherine; Zapata, Yuly Catalina; Lavelle, Patrick; Solarte, Antonio; Suárez, Juan C.; Álvarez-Carrillo, Faver; Romero, M; Rico, Adrian; Sierra, Leidi; Quintero, Marcela

doi:10.1080/21683565.2022.2164638

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is increasing interest in co-designing agroecological practices with farmers, drawing on well-established processes of knowledge co-production developed over decades in sustainability science (e.g. Aare et al, 2021;Bezard et al, 2023;Sachet et al, 2023). We propose that such co-production is important to ensure that the practices benefit biodiversity but also fit within economically viable food production systems, rather than representing a cost to producers and requiring additional economic incentives, such as agrienvironment schemes (Batáry et al, 2015), unlikely to be available in the Global South.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Co‐production of agroecological innovations to improve sustainability in South American fruit farms

Oliveira da Silva,

Arellano,

Felipe Viana

et al. 2024

People and Nature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agricultural intensification and expansion are the main drivers of biodiversity loss that continue to increase this century, especially in South America. International markets and global policy provide incentives and frameworks to address this, but these are unlikely to be effective unless farmers on the ground are enabled and motivated to respond to them by developing long‐term solutions that fit their production systems and local contexts. Here, we use a multi‐actor transdisciplinary approach to co‐design and test agroecological innovations suitable for intensive, exporting South American fruit farms. We focus on highly biodiverse regions experiencing habitat loss in the Mediterranean and dry tropical forest regions of Chile and Brazil, respectively. The innovations were designed to support local biodiversity without compromising productivity or quality. Fourteen farmers participated throughout the project, covering a total of 4178 ha of intensive table grape, mango and cherry production. All were under pressure from buyers to report action on biodiversity. Farmers worked with researchers and industry representatives through an iterative process of dialogues and workshops to select, co‐design and implement three agroecological innovations: perches for birds of prey, cover crops and native hedgerows. Farmers became engaged in monitoring their effectiveness and redesigning them to suit local contexts. We develop an extensive set of resources for ongoing dissemination, including an online sustainability metric to report the practices carried out. Eight farms continued to implement at least one agroecological innovation beyond the end of the project, motivated by its fit to their management system and their ability to report positive actions in their supply chains. Policy implications. Our model of knowledge co‐production demonstrates how transdisciplinary research in agriculture, fully localised in a particular food‐producing context, can enable farmers in the global South to engage with biodiversity conservation in response to top‐down market signals incentivising sustainability. We argue that many top‐down effort to enhance the sustainability of food supply chains, whether through market incentives, voluntary codes or trade regulations, requires locally based knowledge co‐production, in which multiple stakeholders from agriculture and the food industry can benefit from working with locally based researchers. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

show abstract