Codification of Private Law in Estonia

Kull, Irene

doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7942-6_6

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Because the codification of IP law is a continuation of private-law reform (for further discussion on the Estonian law reforms, see Kull (2008Kull ( , 2014, Pärna (2005), Varul (2000Varul ( , 2008), it also follows policy considerations established before. One of the core policy considerations is well articulated by Pärna (2005, p. 223), an expert who has deep insights into Estonian reform processes, as follows: "[The] goal has been to create a simple legal system that is comprehensible to those outside, not to create unique or cryptic law.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

The conceptual bases for codifying Estonia׳s IP law and the main legislative changes: From the comparative approach to embedding drafted law into the socio-economic context

Kelli

2015

International Comparative Jurisprudence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tThe aim of this article is to explore the conceptual bases and methodological issues involved in the codification process of Estonia's intellectual property law and outline the main results. The conceptual bases of this codification consist of evolutionary development, a comparativelaw approach, stakeholder involvement and regulatory impact assessment. The reform draws on the existing regulatory framework (existing IP law), developed further by the identification and use of the best regulatory practices of other countries and model laws. Stakeholder involvement and regulatory impact assessment are used to improve the draft law and make it compatible with Estonian socio-economic conditions. This article summarises the results of the extensive work from

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%