1966
DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1966.tb00356.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coefficient Alpha and the Reliability of Composite Measurements

Abstract: Following a general approach due to Guttman, coef~icient ex is derived as a lower bound on the reliability of a test. The necessary and sufficient condition under which equality is attained in this inequality and hence that ex is equal to the reliability of the test is derived and shown to be closely related to the recent redefinition of the concept op arallel measurements due to Novick. This condition is then also shown to be closely related to the unit rank assumption originally adopted by Kuder and Richards… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
167
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
167
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…18 is in form identical to the classical equation for Cronbach's alpha. Thus, as well documented in the literature (e.g., Novick and Lewis 1967),…”
Section: The Lower and Upper Bounds Of The Irt Test Reliability Coeffsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…18 is in form identical to the classical equation for Cronbach's alpha. Thus, as well documented in the literature (e.g., Novick and Lewis 1967),…”
Section: The Lower and Upper Bounds Of The Irt Test Reliability Coeffsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Though the Case IV result that ≤ might appear to contradict the proof originally published by Novick and Lewis (1967) that is a lower bound of reliability with equality holding under conditions of essential tau equivalence, it must be remembered that our reflects a different definition of true score than that used by Novick and Lewis. The Case IV result that = does accord with the Novick and Lewis proof.…”
Section: Case I: Multidimensional Unequal General Factor Loadingsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Whereas Lord and Novick (1968) and Novick and Lewis (1967) compared with reliability, they did not consider and h as we have done. McDonald (1970McDonald ( , 1999 considered the relation between and h only and did not consider conditions of multidimensionality as we have done.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The total score of the Emotional Functioning subscales for parent proxy-report, Social Functioning, Fatigue, Speech and Communication subscales for selfreport did not approach or exceed 0.70. Although Cronbach's alpha represents the lower boundary of the reliability of a measurement instrument and is a conservative estimate of actual reliability [34], scales that did not achieve the 0.70 standard should be used only for descriptive analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%