2011
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2011.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coercion: Definition and challenges, current approaches, and new trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Triste 'sad' is a SL predicate and hence may occur in small clauses, whereas inteligente 'intelligent' is an IL predicate and therefore cannot appear in small clauses. 3 The phenomenon of coercion is explained by Lauwers andWillems (2011: 1219) as "a mismatch […] between the semantic properties of a selector (be it a construction, a word class, a temporal or aspectual marker) and the inherent semantic properties of a selected element, the latter being not expected in that particular context. The resulting semantic effect […] is a compromise between the combinatorial constraints imposed by the language system and the flexibility (and creativity) allowed by the same system."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triste 'sad' is a SL predicate and hence may occur in small clauses, whereas inteligente 'intelligent' is an IL predicate and therefore cannot appear in small clauses. 3 The phenomenon of coercion is explained by Lauwers andWillems (2011: 1219) as "a mismatch […] between the semantic properties of a selector (be it a construction, a word class, a temporal or aspectual marker) and the inherent semantic properties of a selected element, the latter being not expected in that particular context. The resulting semantic effect […] is a compromise between the combinatorial constraints imposed by the language system and the flexibility (and creativity) allowed by the same system."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, according to this analysis, constructional coercion is the mechanism underlying the formation of N(Deg)-ADJ constructs, and it is also responsible for the potential ambiguities between degree and submodifier readings. This ambiguity could formally be captured by polysemy links item is used in a construction in which it is not typically used, and its meaning is coerced to correspond with the meaning of the parent construction (see, e.g., Michaelis 2002;Lauwers & Willems 2011).…”
Section: N(deg)-adj Compounds As Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, authors who have focused on the perfective past propose that the implicative reading is the result of the coercion of the modal verb when it bears perfective past morphology (Borgonovo 2011;Homer 2011). It is often maintained that at the origin of the phenomenon of coercion there is some conflict between the semantic properties of a selector item (either a construction, a word, or a morpheme) and the semantic properties of an unexpected selected item (Lauwers & Willems 2011). The selector item would be the perfective morphology; the selected and unexpected item, the root modal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%