2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2017.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coercion-resistant proxy voting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, an excellent on-chain governance voting mechanism needs to consider anonymity. Currently, mixed network [42], group signature [43], and ring signature [44] can be used to achieve the anonymity of voting. • Coercion freeness: Coercion means an attacker requires a voter to vote for a particular candidate or abstain.…”
Section: The Attributes Of Voting In On-chain Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an excellent on-chain governance voting mechanism needs to consider anonymity. Currently, mixed network [42], group signature [43], and ring signature [44] can be used to achieve the anonymity of voting. • Coercion freeness: Coercion means an attacker requires a voter to vote for a particular candidate or abstain.…”
Section: The Attributes Of Voting In On-chain Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scheme, however, still allows both the voters and the proxies to prove how they voted. The proposal in [24] ensures coercion resistance (which includes receipt-freeness) in proxy voting by extending the well-known JCJ scheme [25]. It, however, inherits the complexity of JCJ, and therefore, its problems with practical applications such as lack of efficiency and usability for the voters [26].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norway has used an Internet-based voting protocol for some years, and the vote privacy and correctness of this scheme have been demonstrated [23]. In 2016, Kulyk et al [24] proposed a new coercion-resistant proxy voting scheme by extending the coercion-resistant JCJ/Civitas theme, aiming to prevent direct voter coercion, delegation coercion, and proxy coercion. They also proposed a new proxy voting scheme [25] to extend the Helios voting system [26] with delegated voting functionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%