“…8,9 For high coercivity in SmCo 5 magnets, the following structure-property correlations have been understood through detailed studies: i) the presence of high anisotropic SmCo 5 single phase as the matrix, 10 ii) availability of a thin layer of nonmagnetic grain boundary phase to reduce inter-grain magnetic exchange coupling between the neighbouring grains, 11,12 iii) fine grain structure with average grain size in the range of a single domain size (750 nm) to suppress the nucleation of domain walls within the grains, 13,14 and iv) evenly distributed domain wall pinning centres (defects, precipitates and low or high anisotropic secondary phases) within the matrix where the pinning center size is in the range of domain wall thickness of SmCo 5 phase (∼3-4 nm). 15 Suresh et al 6,7 have studied Sm(Co 0.9 Cu 0.1 ) 4.8 melt-spun ribbons using 55 kOe SQUID magnetometer and reported a coercivity of 42.6 kOe in ribbons with wheel speed (WS) of 50 m/s, and the reasons for such high coercivity have been attributed to i) the formation of fine grain size, ii) the absence of unwanted phases, and iii) the presence of more fraction of 1:5 grains. As it is well known that the coercivity in SmCo 5 magnet is strongly dependent on the applied magnetizing field, samples melt spun with various wheel speeds (5,15,30,40 and 50 m/s) in higher fields of 115 kOe.…”