2018
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coevolution of Lexical Meaning and Pragmatic Use

Abstract: According to standard linguistic theory, the meaning of an utterance is the product of conventional semantic meaning and general pragmatic rules on language use. We investigate how such a division of labor between semantics and pragmatics could evolve under general processes of selection and learning. We present a game‐theoretic model of the competition between types of language users, each endowed with certain lexical representations and a particular pragmatic disposition to act on them. Our model traces two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the learner/listener does use their model of the speaker's perspective when interpreting utterances, the speaker doesn't make use of this fact when determining which signal to use to convey a given referential intention. The latter could be achieved by adding an extra layer of pragmatic communication on top, for instance using the rational speech act model (Goodman and Frank 2016) (see Brochhagen et al 2018, for a model that combines iterated language learning with cutural transmission of pragmatic communication). Based on the findings of Brochhagen et al (2018), we predict that adding such pragmatic reasoning skills could change what exactly constitutes a 'useful language' under the two selection pressures we explored here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the learner/listener does use their model of the speaker's perspective when interpreting utterances, the speaker doesn't make use of this fact when determining which signal to use to convey a given referential intention. The latter could be achieved by adding an extra layer of pragmatic communication on top, for instance using the rational speech act model (Goodman and Frank 2016) (see Brochhagen et al 2018, for a model that combines iterated language learning with cutural transmission of pragmatic communication). Based on the findings of Brochhagen et al (2018), we predict that adding such pragmatic reasoning skills could change what exactly constitutes a 'useful language' under the two selection pressures we explored here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter could be achieved by adding an extra layer of pragmatic communication on top, for instance using the rational speech act model (Goodman and Frank 2016) (see Brochhagen et al 2018, for a model that combines iterated language learning with cutural transmission of pragmatic communication). Based on the findings of Brochhagen et al (2018), we predict that adding such pragmatic reasoning skills could change what exactly constitutes a 'useful language' under the two selection pressures we explored here. Certainly under a pressure for successful communication, we would expect that pragmatic agents can make do with somewhat more ambiguous languages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirby 2002;Kirby et al 2014Kirby et al , 2015. In this respect, Brochhagen et al (2018) introduces a model that analyses signaling games with respect to functional pressure toward successful communication and effects of transmission perturbations on (iterated) language learning. Moreover, next to functional factors, social factors, too, are known to be driving forces in language change (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the learner/listener does use their model of the speaker's perspective when interpreting utterances, the speaker doesn't make use of this fact when determining which signal to use for a given referential intention. The latter could be achieved by adding an extra layer of pragmatic communication on top, for instance using the rational speech act model (Goodman and Frank, 2016) (see Brochhagen et al, 2018, for a model that combines iterated language learning with cutural transmission of pragmatic communication). Based on the findings of Brochhagen et al (2018), we predict that adding such pragmatic reasoning skills could change what exactly constitutes a 'useful language' under the two selection pressures we explored here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%