2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3022044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coexistence of 5G With Satellite Services in the Millimeter-Wave Band

Abstract: In this study, a new method is proposed to confirm the possibility of coexistence between the existing satellite services and potential fifth-generation (5G) cellular services in the millimeter-wave band according to the frequency-designation agenda of International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT)-2020 for 5G. To evaluate the accumulated interference power of numerous 5G systems distributed globally at a satellite receiver, we extend the satellite's interference reception area to the entire coverage area, from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, upon the establishment of new satellite terminals (e.g., in teleports) with spectrum sharing in the Ka-band, it is of high priority to assess the potential ground-path interference and, in the case of occurrence, propose any available mitigation countermeasures. The interference assessment between satellite terminals and FS or 5G networks has already been investigated in [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ], also taking into account the impact of tropospheric propagation. Furthermore, International Telecommunications Union Radio (ITU-R) has introduced methods for the determination of the coordination area around any type of earth station that shares a spectrum with terrestrial radiocommunications services when more than one satellite provider is involved [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, upon the establishment of new satellite terminals (e.g., in teleports) with spectrum sharing in the Ka-band, it is of high priority to assess the potential ground-path interference and, in the case of occurrence, propose any available mitigation countermeasures. The interference assessment between satellite terminals and FS or 5G networks has already been investigated in [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ], also taking into account the impact of tropospheric propagation. Furthermore, International Telecommunications Union Radio (ITU-R) has introduced methods for the determination of the coordination area around any type of earth station that shares a spectrum with terrestrial radiocommunications services when more than one satellite provider is involved [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling methods are used to evaluate existing systems or new solutions (e.g., new mitigation algorithm) and, in particular, to evaluate inter- and intra-system electromagnetic compatibility, coexistence of 5G with other systems (e.g., fixed satellite services (FSS) [ 20 , 21 ], radars [ 22 ], long term evolution (LTE) [ 23 ], etc.) or to assess 5G network/system efficiency under occurring interference [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the viewpoint of 5G systems that use mmWaves, massive-MIMO, and beamforming, such analysis should consider narrow beams of antenna systems. Examples of such studies are presented in [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. On the other hand, the analysis of co-channel interference is essential to assessing the coexistence and compatible functioning of different radio systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a near-field, the influence between the individual elements of the multi-antenna system can be investigated [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. In the case of a far-field, inter-beam [ 25 , 26 ], inter-cell [ 18 , 26 , 27 ], or inter-system interferences, i.e., the coexistence of different systems and networks [ 9 , 11 , 28 ], might be studied. In the literature, the vast majority of scientific works concern coexistence topic and the inter-cell interference assessment, rather than inter-beam interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%