1987
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.56.2633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coexistence of Nonmagnetic and Magnetic Co in Cubic Laves Phase Compounds Lu(Co1-xAlx)2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing x, the spontaneous magnetization increases significantly in a limited narrow composition range. It should be pointed out that such a marked increase has not been observed in Lu(Co 1−x Al x ) 2 (Iijima et al 1990, Endo et al 1987a, Gabelko et al 1987, because non-magnetic and magnetic states of Co atoms coexist in the composition range 0.06 x 0.12 (Endo et al 1987b, Shinogi et al 1987. It is considered that the difference mentioned above comes also from the annealing conditions of the specimens as discussed in connection with figure 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With increasing x, the spontaneous magnetization increases significantly in a limited narrow composition range. It should be pointed out that such a marked increase has not been observed in Lu(Co 1−x Al x ) 2 (Iijima et al 1990, Endo et al 1987a, Gabelko et al 1987, because non-magnetic and magnetic states of Co atoms coexist in the composition range 0.06 x 0.12 (Endo et al 1987b, Shinogi et al 1987. It is considered that the difference mentioned above comes also from the annealing conditions of the specimens as discussed in connection with figure 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In both compounds mentioned above, no sharp metamagnetic transition has been observed in relatively low magnetic fields because of the onset of a weak ferromagnetism in Y(Co 1−x Al x ) 2 (Aleksandryan et al 1985, Sakakibara et al 1986, 1990a and the coexistence of non-magnetic and magnetic states of Co atoms in Lu(Co 1−x Al x ) 2 (Endo et al 1987b, Shinogi et al 1987. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that Lu(Co 1−x Ga x ) 2 compounds show a sharp itinerant-electron metamagnetic transition even in low magnetic fields (Murata et al 1993a-c) in contrast to Y(Co 1−x Al x ) 2 and Lu(Co 1−x Al x ) 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Lu(Co 1−x Al x ) 2 with x = 0.06 and 0.08, on the other hand, an extremely broad hysteresis in the metamagnetic transition curves has been observed [16]. In addition, the coexistence of paramagnetic and ferromagnetic Co atoms in the compound with x = 0.08 has been indicated by NMR experiment [27]. However, detailed considerations of magnetic properties of Lu(Co 1−x Al x ) 2 in the vicinity of the critical concentration for the onset of ferromagnetism have not been made yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In some materials, magnetic cluster excitations can occur in the paramagnetic region above T c or above T N [47][48][49][50][51][52], causing the appearance of spin waves in the paramagnetic phase, for instance, in Ni, Fe, EuO, EuS, Pd 3 Fe, and Gd [53][54][55][56][57][58]. The coexistence of ferromagnetic and nonmagnetic phases was also observed in Y 2 Co 7 , YCo 3 , Co(S x Se 1−x ) 2 , Co(Ti x Al 1−x ) 2 , and Lu(Co 1−x Al x ) 2 [59,60]. In colossal magnetoresistance materials, such as La 1−x Ca x MnO 3 and La 1−x Sr x CoO 3 , one observes the coexistence of a paramagnetic insulating, or semiconducting, phase and a ferromagnetic metallic phase [61][62][63], while in La 0.67−x Bi x Ca 0.33 MnO 3 , paramagnetic and antiferromagnetic phases coexist [64].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%