2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2003.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coexistence of phosphotyrosine-dependent and -independent interactions between Cbl and Bcr-Abl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47 Bcr-Abl trafficking, not its proteasomal degradation, appears to underlie the major impact of WP1130 on CML cells and is aligned with previously described activities associated with increased K63-specific ubiquitin polymers on target proteins. 31 Because Ubc13 (E2) is the only known enzyme involved in forming K63-linked polyubiquitin chains, 48 this restricts the number of potential upstream components that provide K63-linked ubiquitin polymers for subsequent transfer to Bcr-Abl.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…47 Bcr-Abl trafficking, not its proteasomal degradation, appears to underlie the major impact of WP1130 on CML cells and is aligned with previously described activities associated with increased K63-specific ubiquitin polymers on target proteins. 31 Because Ubc13 (E2) is the only known enzyme involved in forming K63-linked polyubiquitin chains, 48 this restricts the number of potential upstream components that provide K63-linked ubiquitin polymers for subsequent transfer to Bcr-Abl.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…It has previously been shown that individual mutations of the Tyr 177 to Phe, and deletion of the SH2 and Proline domains of BCR-ABL do not abolish the associations between BCR-ABL and its substrates [17], [22], [23], [24], [26], nor do they completely abolish the kinase activity [19], [20], [25], [27]. Kinase assays were performed to determine if the kinase activity of BCR-ABL was impaired in the triple mutant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that tyrosine phosphorylated CBL complexes with the SH2 domain on p210BCR-ABL1 but deletion of the SH2 domain of p210BCR-ABL1 does not inhibit the association which implies that CBL can interact with p210BCR-ABL1 via other mechanisms (Bhat et al, 1997). It has been proposed that an alternative mechanism by which unphosphorylated CBL and p210BCR-ABL1 associate may be via adaptor protein GBR2 (Gaston et al, 2004), which has been shown to activate RAS signaling (Pendergast et al, 1993;Puil et al, 1994). CRKL is an adaptor protein related to the CRK oncogene of the avian viral sarcoma virus (ten Hoeve et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%