2005
DOI: 10.1080/15265160500320593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coexisting Commitments to Ethics and Human Research: A Preliminary Study of the Perspectives of 83 Medical Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research may also fruitfully explore the views of alternative decision makers (for example, legally authorized representatives) in assessing protocol risks. Finally, new studies are needed to determine optimal ways of helping health professionals to address the ethically important aspects of their work with patients and participants, a topic area of great interest and concern (50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research may also fruitfully explore the views of alternative decision makers (for example, legally authorized representatives) in assessing protocol risks. Finally, new studies are needed to determine optimal ways of helping health professionals to address the ethically important aspects of their work with patients and participants, a topic area of great interest and concern (50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, medical students are positively disposed towards research ethics and report desires to conduct research in an ethical fashion. 34 Unfortunately, recent evidence indicates that early career scholars engage in numerous behaviors that either ignore, avoid, or outright violate policies aimed at protecting research participants. 35 What happens between medical school and a young researcher's early career that changes these attitudes and behaviors?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been pointed out that, so far, research ethics training for researchers, especially during their academic research training, has been underemphasised (Faden et al, 2002;Gordon and Parsi, 2002;Rhodes, 2002;Roberts et al, 2005;Sharp, 2002), even though researchers themselves see a demand for such training (Roberts and Mcauliffe, 2006 (FhI, 2001). In the USa, some certified training programmes are available for researchers with different functions; however, the extent of the specifically ethical elements contained in this training are somewhat unclear (see www.primr.org/uploadedFiles/PRIMR_Site_home/Certification/CIP/Navy%20 -%206.2007.pdf).…”
Section: Rec Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%