2000
DOI: 10.1039/b003733h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coexisting covalent and non-covalent planar networks in the crystal structures of {[M(bipy)2(NO3)2]·arene}n (M = Ni, 1; Co, 2; arene = chlorobenzene, o-dichlorobenzene, benzene, nitrobenzene, toluene or anisole) †

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further expansion of the structure by propagation of this symbiotic unit constituting of complementary stacking and coordination portions is impossible since the significantly contracted [Co(HCOO)] 4 core evidently can not afford regular polymeric array, cf. 2D net seen in 2. Notable, in this context, that aromatic species themselves easily form different supramolecular arrays that can exist as 2D stacks or even interpenetrate with 2D coordination polymers [17,18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further expansion of the structure by propagation of this symbiotic unit constituting of complementary stacking and coordination portions is impossible since the significantly contracted [Co(HCOO)] 4 core evidently can not afford regular polymeric array, cf. 2D net seen in 2. Notable, in this context, that aromatic species themselves easily form different supramolecular arrays that can exist as 2D stacks or even interpenetrate with 2D coordination polymers [17,18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 The complementary coordination and aromatic networks interpenetrate in a manner described as parallel/diagonal inclined interpenetration as illustrated in Figure 10 for {[Ni(bipy) 2 (NO 3 ) 2 ]·chlorobenzene} n , 10.…”
Section: Catananes or Interpenetrated Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bond lengths associated with the metal atoms in both complexes are within the range reported for Ni II complexes with similar coordinating atoms. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] However, the average Ni-O suc and Ni-N bipy bonds are shorter, and Ni-O water bonds are longer in 1 compared to those in 2 (see Tables 1 and 2). It is possible that these differences in the bond lengths and the variation of the helicity of the Ni-suc chain in the two complexes are due to the high pressure conditions used for the synthesis of 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%