“…If directly applied the existing extraction technologies to the judicial field, they will face the problem of incident type mismatch (Filtz et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020). In addition, many extraction technologies (e.g., Balali et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2015;Nguyen et al, 2016) were experimentally verified on publicly available English data sets, but in the Chinese judicial field, as far as we know, there was no standard experimental data (Feng et al, 2022). Furthermore, in Chinese divorce legal cases, there are many sentences containing multiple events that share arguments or trigger words, but most of the existing technologies are focused on extracting a single event from a single sentence (Zeng et al, 2018), which cannot solve this problem.…”