Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Historical memory is often short, and perhaps nowhere more so than in scientific research. As scientists chase new insights and novel tools, they are rarely rewarded for possessing deep knowledge of their disciplines' past trajectories. Textbook sidebars spotlight singular individuals or celebrated experiments, and institutional accounts highlight founders and funders. Such highlights introduce a tiny-and unrepresentative-fraction of scientific work. Yet, the possibilities and pitfalls of today's research are conditioned by the past.Our contention in bringing together this special issue is that examining the history of plant science and technology is essential to the goals of Plants, People, Planet-that is, to the development of cross-disciplinary approaches in the plant sciences that will foster the insights and energy necessary to tackle the global social and environmental challenges of the present (Hiscock et al., 2023). As the contributions highlight, attention to history can serve many agendas: guiding breeding programs, shaping conservation strategy, tempering expectations for extension work, informing public policy, highlighting the continued legacies of colonialism, and more. It can also serve as the glue that brings researchers from different disciplines into conversation. In this issue, readers will encounter historical accounts (co-) developed by agroecologists, anthropologists, biologists, breeders, development experts, historians, sociologists, and scholars of science and technology studies (STS). Though the contributions traverse many decades and continents, their shared terrain is the archive of past plant science and technology, whether inscribed in books and written records, genes and landscapes, or memories and oral traditions.Our cross-disciplinary histories center on another crossdisciplinary domain: crop science. The study of plants we use as food and fodder (and fuel and fiber, too, though they do not come in for scrutiny in this collection) has played an outsized role in exploring and promoting solutions to the challenges of feeding the world. Over many decades, researchers with expertise in fields such as agronomy, genetics, plant physiology, crop ecology, and biotechnology have reconfigured genes, fields, and ecosystems to extend the biophysical limits of food and fodder production. The outcomes of this work are
Historical memory is often short, and perhaps nowhere more so than in scientific research. As scientists chase new insights and novel tools, they are rarely rewarded for possessing deep knowledge of their disciplines' past trajectories. Textbook sidebars spotlight singular individuals or celebrated experiments, and institutional accounts highlight founders and funders. Such highlights introduce a tiny-and unrepresentative-fraction of scientific work. Yet, the possibilities and pitfalls of today's research are conditioned by the past.Our contention in bringing together this special issue is that examining the history of plant science and technology is essential to the goals of Plants, People, Planet-that is, to the development of cross-disciplinary approaches in the plant sciences that will foster the insights and energy necessary to tackle the global social and environmental challenges of the present (Hiscock et al., 2023). As the contributions highlight, attention to history can serve many agendas: guiding breeding programs, shaping conservation strategy, tempering expectations for extension work, informing public policy, highlighting the continued legacies of colonialism, and more. It can also serve as the glue that brings researchers from different disciplines into conversation. In this issue, readers will encounter historical accounts (co-) developed by agroecologists, anthropologists, biologists, breeders, development experts, historians, sociologists, and scholars of science and technology studies (STS). Though the contributions traverse many decades and continents, their shared terrain is the archive of past plant science and technology, whether inscribed in books and written records, genes and landscapes, or memories and oral traditions.Our cross-disciplinary histories center on another crossdisciplinary domain: crop science. The study of plants we use as food and fodder (and fuel and fiber, too, though they do not come in for scrutiny in this collection) has played an outsized role in exploring and promoting solutions to the challenges of feeding the world. Over many decades, researchers with expertise in fields such as agronomy, genetics, plant physiology, crop ecology, and biotechnology have reconfigured genes, fields, and ecosystems to extend the biophysical limits of food and fodder production. The outcomes of this work are
Societal Impact StatementDespite strong historical declines, Guadeloupe and Haiti's coffee sectors remain important to rural communities' livelihood and resilience. Coffee also holds value as part of the islands' historical legacy and cultural identities. Furthermore, it is often grown in agroforestry systems providing important ecosystem services, which will become more important as these vulnerable islands work to adapt to a changing climate. Current efforts to revitalize coffee farms and target strategically important specialty markets would benefit from understanding existing genetic resources and the historical factors that shaped them. Our study reveals the rich history reflected in current coffee stands on the islands.Summary The West Indies, particularly former French colonies like Haiti and Guadeloupe, were central to the spread of coffee in the Americas. The histories of these Islands are shared until the 19th century, where they diverged significantly. Still, both Islands experienced a strong decline in their coffee sector. Characterizing the genetic and varietal diversity of their coffee resources and understanding historical factors shaping them can help support revitalization efforts. To that end, we performed Kompetitve Allele‐Specific PCR (KASP) genotyping of 80 informative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers on field samples from across main coffee‐growing region of Guadeloupe, and two historically important ones in Haiti, as well as 146 reference accessions from international collections. We also compared bioclimatic variables from sampled geographic areas and searched for historical determinants of present coffee resources. At least five Coffea arabica varietal groups were found in Haiti, versus two in Guadeloupe, with admixed individuals in both. The traditional Typica variety is still present in both islands, growing across a variety of climatic environments. We also found Coffea canephora on both islands, with multiple likely origins, and identified C. liberica var. liberica in Guadeloupe. These differences are explained by the Islands' respective histories. Overall, Guadeloupe experienced fewer, but older introductions of non‐Typica coffee. By contrast, several recent introductions have taken place in Haiti, driven by local and global factors and reflecting the history of Arabica varietal development and spread. Diversity on these islands is dynamic, and our results reveal opportunities and limits to the future of Guadeloupean and Haitian coffee.
The sustainability of global coffee supply is threatened by production challenges worsening with every decade since the turn of the 21st century. Coffee is among the most popular beverages in the world, and its production supports livelihoods of millions of people, mostly smallholder farmers. With a global market value exceeding US$130 billion, the coffee industry is a source of export revenue for producing countries, the majority of which are developing nations in the Global South. Climate change, pests, and diseases continue to hamper productivity, profitability, and countries’ competitiveness in the global market. At the same time, the global demand for coffee continues to rise. A crucial pillar to safeguarding the future of coffee is continuously developing improved varieties suitable for the changing environment, and that address the needs of farmers and the industry. Yet, most national breeding programs are grossly out of touch with climate change reality and market dynamics. Working in isolation, these programs are constrained by unstable funding, limited sources of genetic variability, and inaccessibility of modern technologies necessary to accelerate the breeding process. We review here key production challenges, status of genetic diversity, and breeding approaches. Additionally, we explore opportunities in leveraging a pre-competitive collaborative breeding approach encompassing sharing of germplasm, and cross-border multi-environment trials in developing next-generation cultivars. We argue that breeding efforts should be informed by the needs of all the stakeholders in the supply chain including researchers, smallholder farmers, small and medium-sized enterprises investing in coffee processing and roasting, and consumers. Using emerging and reviving producers in Southeast Asia and Eastern Africa as a model, we explore how a paradigm shift in coffee breeding from the historically nation-centric approach to a more forward-looking collaborative model could improve the efficiency of variety improvement in face of climate change and growing market demand.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.