2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8809(02)00204-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coffee production, timber, and firewood in traditional and Inga-shaded plantations in Southern Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
3
16

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
47
3
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the variation in production of shaded coffee is more influenced by factors like management practices or the intensity of inputs applied than by the available radiation for the trees (Romero-Alvarado et al, 2002), one must consider the yield level of the studied sites. A report of no effect of shading by Inga on coffee yield cited productivity of 725 kg ha -1 (Peeters et al, 2003). In an on-farm study in the state of Chiapas, Mexico, the yields of high-shaded coffee (60-80%) and medium-shaded coffee (30-50%) were similar, around 1600 kg ha -1 , although data were taken for just one year (Lin, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the variation in production of shaded coffee is more influenced by factors like management practices or the intensity of inputs applied than by the available radiation for the trees (Romero-Alvarado et al, 2002), one must consider the yield level of the studied sites. A report of no effect of shading by Inga on coffee yield cited productivity of 725 kg ha -1 (Peeters et al, 2003). In an on-farm study in the state of Chiapas, Mexico, the yields of high-shaded coffee (60-80%) and medium-shaded coffee (30-50%) were similar, around 1600 kg ha -1 , although data were taken for just one year (Lin, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementary research has focused mainly on improving agroforestry management practices to increase the compatibility of shade coffee production with shade trees that provide provisioning services (e.g., timber, fruit, and firewood) and supporting ecosystem services (e.g., shade, N-fixation, and organic matter contribution ;Beer 1987;Somarriba 1990;Beer et al 1998;Peeters et al 2003). Recent work has also highlighted the desirability to explicitly combine C sequestration with biodiversity conservation in agroforestry systems (Kirby and Potvin 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous evaluations by El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR) have shown that agroforestry systems provide multiple environmental services and can increase productivity, land and labour worth in relation to conventional land uses, such as extensive cattle farming and maize crops without trees (Soto-Pinto et al, 2010; Soto-Pinto, submitted). Coffee cultivation under the shade of trees conserves at least 40% of the total woody plant www.intechopen.com diversity in scarce neighbouring forests (Soto-Pinto et al, 2000;Romero-Alvarado et al, 2002;Peeters et al, 2003). Organic coffee cultivation translates into a higher carbon content in the upper soil layer (0-30 cm) than non-organic coffee systems, being able to store between 129.8 and 215.6 Mg C ha -1 in their components, including soil C (Soto- Pinto et al, 2010).…”
Section: Agroforestry In Chilón and Salto De Agua Chiapasmentioning
confidence: 99%