2019 5th Conference on Knowledge Based Engineering and Innovation (KBEI) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/kbei.2019.8735077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cogging Torque Reduction of 6/13 Hybrid Excited Flux Switching Machine with Rotor Step Skewing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods of reducing the cogging torque usually do not eliminate it completely. Therefore, a common design practice is to minimize the cogging torque of the machine using more than one reduction method [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods of reducing the cogging torque usually do not eliminate it completely. Therefore, a common design practice is to minimize the cogging torque of the machine using more than one reduction method [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• appropriate choice of the angular span of the rotor poles (teeth) in reluctance machines [14,15]; • making slots in the stator or rotor that are skewed [3,4,11,[14][15][16][17]; • desymmetrization of the angular arrangement of rotor poles (teeth) in reluctance machines [4,10,11]; • choice of the shape of the face of the poles/teeth of the stator or rotor [18,19]; • making cuts in the stator teeth or inserting additional teeth [7,15,17]; • using an appropriate current power supply [12,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the benefits of a FSPM machine outweigh its drawbacks, these disadvantages could be significant issues on competitive markets. To diminish the torque ripple of FSPM machines, some approaches on rotor designing process are used like rotor pole pairing and rotor pole skewing [9] in a salient pole rotor, and rotor pole notching [10] and transverse laminations [11] in a segmented one. Moreover, to reduce FSPM machine costs, the ferrite magnet is proposed as a suitable alternative to the rare‐earth one which is because the price of a ferrite magnet is almost 10% of the price of a REPMs [12] in the same size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%