1977
DOI: 10.3138/97r4-84n4-4226-0p24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognition In Cartography

Abstract: health sciences, history THE CANADIAN HISTORICAL REVIEW utpjournals.press/chr Offering a comprehensive analysis on the events that have shaped Canada, CHR publishes articles that examine Canadian history from both a multicultural and multidisciplinary perspective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
16

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…With the dawn of experimental cartography (Eckert, 1921(Eckert, /1925Robinson, 1952) and especially since cognitive questions play a greater role in cartography (e.g., Petchenik, 1975;Medyckyj-Scott & Board, 1991;MacEachren, 1995; for an overview see Montello, 2002) map design improved by incorporating a cognitive perspective. However, most cognitively motivated studies focus on the thematic content or the overall design of maps and not on spatial components.…”
Section: Schematic Conceptual Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the dawn of experimental cartography (Eckert, 1921(Eckert, /1925Robinson, 1952) and especially since cognitive questions play a greater role in cartography (e.g., Petchenik, 1975;Medyckyj-Scott & Board, 1991;MacEachren, 1995; for an overview see Montello, 2002) map design improved by incorporating a cognitive perspective. However, most cognitively motivated studies focus on the thematic content or the overall design of maps and not on spatial components.…”
Section: Schematic Conceptual Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He believed that Western Europe has no monopoly on cartography as a mark of civilization. Children, artists, indigenous societies, and ancient people all make maps (Blaut 1987;Petchenik 1975).…”
Section: Viewpoints On Art and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until the 1980s, the focus was mostly on analysing the psychophysical effects triggered by isolated map symbols (for a review, see Montello 2002), but the approach had a large number of critics due to problems with applying the research to practical map design processes (e.g., Petchenik 1975Petchenik , 1983). Research on the perception of individual map symbols and limited comparisons of symbols was done in a general fashion, and at the same time scholars noticed that the problem of understanding a map is far more complex and extensive than previously thought (Petchenik 1975). However, scholars for the most part accepted the value of a user perspective since the opinions of cartography experts alone proved insufficient for developing efficient maps (Hocking and Keller 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%