2015
DOI: 10.1002/dys.1500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Abilities Underlying Reading Accuracy, Fluency and Spelling Acquisition in Korean Hangul Learners from Grades 1 to 4: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Abstract: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to examine the cognitive abilities that predict reading and spelling performance in Korean children in Grades 1 to 4, depending on expertise and reading experience. As a result, visual cognition, phonological awareness, naming speed and receptive vocabulary significantly predicted reading accuracy in children in Grades 1 and 2, whereas visual cognition, phonological awareness and rapid naming speed did not predict reading accuracy in children in higher grades. For … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In yet another study done on an orthographically distinct Korean Hangul language, that shows the typological combination of alphabetic and syllabic orthographies, children from Grade 1 to 4 were tested on reading-related tasks and their cognitive skills. Phoneme awareness was seen to be the most important predictor of reading accuracy (words as well as for non-words) in Grade 1 and 2, but in Grade 3 and 4, it got replaced by receptive vocabulary (Park & Uno, 2015). On the other hand, fluency of reading was best predicted by naming speed and receptive vocabulary but not by phoneme awareness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In yet another study done on an orthographically distinct Korean Hangul language, that shows the typological combination of alphabetic and syllabic orthographies, children from Grade 1 to 4 were tested on reading-related tasks and their cognitive skills. Phoneme awareness was seen to be the most important predictor of reading accuracy (words as well as for non-words) in Grade 1 and 2, but in Grade 3 and 4, it got replaced by receptive vocabulary (Park & Uno, 2015). On the other hand, fluency of reading was best predicted by naming speed and receptive vocabulary but not by phoneme awareness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Other research examined the cognitive abilities that predict reading and spelling performance in Korean children in Grades 1-4. Park and Uno [36] found that the contribution of phonological awareness to Hangul reading accuracy appears to occur only during the first 2 years of schooling, and RAN speed significantly predicted word-reading accuracy only in Grade 1. Further, the results of path analysis revealed that receptive vocabulary contributed exclusively and substantially to Hangul word-reading accuracy in Grades 1-4.…”
Section: A Review Of International Studies and Phonological Processinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are 24 graphemes, 14 are consonants and 10 are basic vowels. Hangul graphemes consistently represent sounds with a one-to-one correspondence and are combined in a limited number of patterns [36]. In a study using Hangul, researchers investigated the association of RAN and regular/irregular words in 4-and 5-yearold Korean children and found that RAN was uniquely associated with reading ability of both regular and irregular words [37].…”
Section: A Review Of International Studies and Phonological Processinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that phonological awareness (PA) is an important component for learning how to associate sounds with letters, but its reliability as a predictor of reading skills can vary (e.g. Caravolas et al, 2012;Georgiou, Torppa, Manolitsis, Lyytinen, & Parrila, 2012;Moll et al, 2014;Park & Uno, 2015;Wimmer, Mayringer, & Landerl, 2000). For example, Ziegler et al (2010) studied predictors of second graders' reading skills in Finnish, Hungarian, Dutch, Portuguese, and French, and found that PA was the strongest significant predictor of reading accuracy and fluency across all orthographies except Finnish.…”
Section: Cognitive Predictors Of Reading Development Among Different Orthographiesmentioning
confidence: 99%