2016
DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1179271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Aids for Role Definition (CARD) to improve interprofessional team crisis resource management: An exploratory study

Abstract: This study aimed to assess the perceived value of the Cognitive Aids for Role Definition (CARD) protocol for simulated intraoperative cardiac arrests. Sixteen interprofessional operating room teams completed three consecutive simulated intraoperative cardiac arrest scenarios: current standard, no CARD; CARD, no CARD teaching; and CARD, didactic teaching. Each team participated in a focus group interview immediately following the third scenario; data were transcribed verbatim and qualitatively analysed. After 6… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A surgical checklist, for example, might provide information support via one step where all team members must announce their name and role, but in other steps, it might provide decision support for actions to take in event of heart or lung stoppage (McLaughlin et al, 2016). Another type of aid, role cards attached to surgical team members, would provide the same information support as the aforementioned checklist could, but is not a checklist (Renna et al, 2016). A different checklist might provide none of those supports (WHO, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A surgical checklist, for example, might provide information support via one step where all team members must announce their name and role, but in other steps, it might provide decision support for actions to take in event of heart or lung stoppage (McLaughlin et al, 2016). Another type of aid, role cards attached to surgical team members, would provide the same information support as the aforementioned checklist could, but is not a checklist (Renna et al, 2016). A different checklist might provide none of those supports (WHO, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. For the important outcome of time to starting CPR in simulated resuscitations, between course conclusion and 1 year we identified very low-certainty evidence in 1 randomized trial, 204 downgraded for indirectness and imprecision. This outcome was evaluated in only 4 resuscitation teams, and there was no difference (15 seconds without versus 14 seconds with cognitive aid).…”
Section: Population Intervention Comparator Outcome Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. For the important outcome of CCF/hands-off time (HOT) in simulated resuscitations, between course conclusion and 1 year in simulated resuscitations, we identified very low-certainty evidence in 1 randomized trial, 204 downgraded for risk of bias, indirectness, and imprecision. No significant differences in percentage HOT were found when resuscitation teams used a cognitive aid (18.9% when 4 teams did not versus 15.8% when 4 teams did use a cognitive aid, NS).…”
Section: For the Important Outcome Of Chest Compression Rate In Simulmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations