1994
DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1994.1006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive and Affective Bases of Attitudes toward Social Groups and Social Policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
183
2
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
183
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To develop a valid survey instrument grounded in theory, we constructed the survey using Eagly, Mladinic and Otto's attitude survey template, 21 which is based on Zanna and Rempell's tripartite model of attitudes. 22 The key idea of this model is that people's attitudes are comprised of three distinct types of information: (1) their knowledge and experience, (2) their emotions, and (3) their beliefs.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop a valid survey instrument grounded in theory, we constructed the survey using Eagly, Mladinic and Otto's attitude survey template, 21 which is based on Zanna and Rempell's tripartite model of attitudes. 22 The key idea of this model is that people's attitudes are comprised of three distinct types of information: (1) their knowledge and experience, (2) their emotions, and (3) their beliefs.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the open-ended measure permitted us to tap those emotions, traits, and values that were most relevant to the participants, rather than forcing them to rate emotions, traits, and values that might not have been relevant to them. Such utilization of participants' idiosyncratic responses is the most important benefit of open-ended measures, which has caused several researchers to recommend their use (e.g., Eagly, Mladinic, & Otto, 1994;Stangor & Lange, 1994). Another advantage of the open-ended procedure is that it can be used to measure and statistically control attitudinal properties other than ambivalence (e.g., evaluative/ cognitive consistency; see Results).…”
Section: The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotions, stereotypes, and symbolic beliefs were assessed separately using an open-ended procedure (see also Eagly & Mladinic, 1989;Eagly et al, 1994;Esses et al, 1993;Stangor et al, 1991). To assess emotions, participants were asked to list emotions and feelings that they experienced when they saw, met, or thought about Oriental people.…”
Section: Ambivalence Toward Oriental Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third aspect concerns the fact that the influence of affective, cognitive and behavioral components on overall attitudinal evaluations can vary across both between individuals and attitude objects (e.g., Eagly, Mladinic, & Otto, 1994;Esses et al, 1993;. Some individuals, across a wide range of attitude objects, possess attitudes that are largely consistent with either their affective or cognitive responses.…”
Section: Relationship Between Affective and Cognitive Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%