2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96229713.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive and behavioural factors as predictors of abstinence following treatment for alcohol dependence

Abstract: The results of this study are consistent with the extensive literature that confirms the predictor power of self-efficacy. Unexpectedly, it did not find independent positive relationships between other psychological variables and abstinence. Given that self-efficacy can predict outcome in the medium term, it is suggested that treatment could target this variable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
48
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In clinical settings, severe psychosocial stressors, psychosocial vulnerability and self-efficacy were associated with relapse after treatment [21,22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical settings, severe psychosocial stressors, psychosocial vulnerability and self-efficacy were associated with relapse after treatment [21,22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study vary from those of studies conducted with subjects who are using other substances, where improved self-efficacy was shown to have a positive effect on outcome (Ciraulo et al, 2003;Rychtarik et al, 1992;Vielva & Iraurgi, 2001;. According to the literature, clients are better able to remain abstinent from opiates when scoring high on the self-efficacy scale.…”
Section: Treatment Outcomescontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Studies of alcoholics show that those with higher self-efficacy scores were better able to resist the urge to drink when tempted, and remained sober longer Rychtarik, Prue, Rapp, & King, 1992;Solomon & Annis, 1990;Vielva & Iraurgi, 2001). …”
Section: Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expectancy that reinforcement will follow potential drinking behaviors (the perceived internal and external loci of control) is learned (Donovan & Marlatt, 1980). Relapse was linked with more external locus of control (Kivlahan, Donovan, & Walker, 1983;Vielva & Iraurgi, 2001). In comparison to patients with severe alcohol dependence, a patient in the recovery stage tends to have an internal locus of control (Huckstadt, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Principal components factor analysis 17 items divided into 3 factors, and each model has 50-67% of the total variance Li et al (2000) 48 Alcoholics Anonymous members and 33 recovery members DRIE total scores (25 items) and nonpaired t test Alcoholics Anonymous patients scored significantly more on external locus of control on the DRIE than did recovering members Vielva and Iraurgi (2001) 201 alcohol-dependent patients DRIE scores and logistic regression analysis…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%