1995
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05130-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

60
886
3
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,437 publications
(957 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
60
886
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have frequently identified a target-selective parietal positive component, the P300 (Polich, 2007;Polich and Kok, 1995). Although the latency of our target-selective potential is similar to that of the typical P300 (250-500 ms) the scalp polarity is negative and the potential peaks at rather lateral sites.…”
Section: Relationship To Previous Event-related Potential (Erp) Studiesmentioning
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies have frequently identified a target-selective parietal positive component, the P300 (Polich, 2007;Polich and Kok, 1995). Although the latency of our target-selective potential is similar to that of the typical P300 (250-500 ms) the scalp polarity is negative and the potential peaks at rather lateral sites.…”
Section: Relationship To Previous Event-related Potential (Erp) Studiesmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…2c). This relatively negative and bilateral occipital distributed differential activity on correctly detected targets differs from the widely study P300 ERP component which is positive and peaks at parietal electrodes (Polich and Kok, 1995). In order to recover the brain regions responsible for the effects seen at the electrodes, we estimated the cortical current density distribution for each subject using a distributed inverse method.…”
Section: Stimulus-locked Evoked Responses In Visual Cortexmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the precise mechanism underlying this effect is not yet well understood. The P3 has been associated with motivation (Carrillo-de-la-Pena & Cadaveira, 2000), attention (Squires & Ollo, 1999) and arousal (Polich & Kok, 1995) which are in turn associated with reward processing in healthy individuals (Ressler, 2004). Similarly, patients with major depressive disorder (Bruder, et al, 1995), schizophrenia (Javitt, Doneshka, Grochowski, & Ritter, 1995), alcoholism (Porjesz, Begleiter, Bihari, & Kissin, 1987) or family history of alcoholism (Ramsey & Finn, 1997), disorders affecting reward processing but also motivation, attention, and arousal, show decreased P3 amplitude to cognitive and emotional targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two ERP components, the FRN and the P3, were chosen as the ERP measures of feedback processing (Donchin, Ritter, & McCallum, 1978; Gehring & Willoughby, 2002; Miltner, Braun, & Coles, 1997; Polich & Kok, 1995). The FRN is a medial frontal negativity that appears approximately 200–300 ms following feedback presentation, which is larger following monetary losses than gains (Gehring & Willoughby, 2002; Walsh & Anderson, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%