2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41393-018-0151-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive appraisals and emotional status following a spinal cord injury in post-acute rehabilitation

Abstract: Findings support a two-factor structure and validity of ADAPSS-SF in acute SCI rehabilitation. The study provides support for the role of cognitive appraisals in psychological adjustment in the early phases of rehabilitation, above injury characteristics. Findings highlighted the vulnerable subgroups that are more likely to initially endorse negative appraisals, which may influence clinical practice and provides an avenue for further research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, similar to Peter and colleagues (2014, 2015) the present study identified direct effects of threat and loss appraisals on both, depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms. Associations between negative appraisals and worse psychological adaptation outcomes over and above injury characteristics and other biological factors have also been reported in previous studies focusing on acute phase or inpatient rehabilitation (Eaton et al, 2018; Kennedy et al 2009). Additionally, other studies have identified appraisals at the beginning of inpatient rehabilitation to influence the development of adaptation indicators such as depression and anxiety up to two years after injury onset (Bonanno et al, 2012; Kennedy et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Moreover, similar to Peter and colleagues (2014, 2015) the present study identified direct effects of threat and loss appraisals on both, depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms. Associations between negative appraisals and worse psychological adaptation outcomes over and above injury characteristics and other biological factors have also been reported in previous studies focusing on acute phase or inpatient rehabilitation (Eaton et al, 2018; Kennedy et al 2009). Additionally, other studies have identified appraisals at the beginning of inpatient rehabilitation to influence the development of adaptation indicators such as depression and anxiety up to two years after injury onset (Bonanno et al, 2012; Kennedy et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…To determine the construct validity of the B-IPQ total score and the B-IPQ subscale score, Spearman's correlations were calculated. We expected strong (≥.50) correlations with the symptoms of anxiety, depression, and resilience (‘convergent validity’), 11 and weak (≤.30) correlations with gender, age, living situation, educational levels, level of injury, and completeness of the injury (‘divergent validity’). 1819 The validity was confirmed when at least 75% (7:9) of these expectations were met.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of the current research was to study the (a) reliability and validity of the B-IPQ with eight items and possible subscales and (b) the interpretation of B-IPQ total scores, among rehabilitation inpatients with the SCI. We tested four hypotheses: (1) it is possible to compose reliable subscales with items of the B-IPQ, (2) strong correlations will be found between scores on the B-IPQ and measures of anxiety, depression, and resilience, 11 (3) weak correlation coefficients will be found between B-IPQ scores and demographic and injury-related characteristics, and (4) appropriate B-IPQ cut-off points will be determined for the interpretation of the level of experienced threat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain intensity and perceived manageability improved over time, demonstrating the positive impact of diverse and intense rehabilitation. SCI requires extensive adjustment [49,55] and such adaptation requires support from multiple disciplines to provide a cohesive, manageable care plan for patients. Consequently, it can be inferred that a diverse, multi-faceted rehabilitation programme can have numerous health benefits for individuals with SCI including improved perceptions of manageability and coping post injury as well as in relation to pain outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADAPSS-SF [48] is a self-evaluative measure of SCI impact and disability that is used to determine how patients perceive their own coping resources, the perceived adequacy of such resources and the likelihood that these can be employed effectively [49][50][51]. The measure comprises six items and has a 6-point Likert scale to measure how participants perceive their sense of disability in the context of their SCI.…”
Section: Appraisals Of Disability Primary and Secondary Scaleshort Fomentioning
confidence: 99%