2007
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive assessment in the elderly: a review of clinical methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
221
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
1
221
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Mental screening tests are good at detecting the presence of dementia but not its origin. Cognitive assessment scales vary largely with regard to sensitivity, specificity, and cutoffs, and currently there is no gold standard for detecting cognitive function and impairment (85). Standardization of cognitive assessment methods could improve comparison of results from different studies and allow for meta-analyses to be performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental screening tests are good at detecting the presence of dementia but not its origin. Cognitive assessment scales vary largely with regard to sensitivity, specificity, and cutoffs, and currently there is no gold standard for detecting cognitive function and impairment (85). Standardization of cognitive assessment methods could improve comparison of results from different studies and allow for meta-analyses to be performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural background had an influence on MMSE performance, and education is closely related to cultural background 22. MMSE scores generally decline with advancing age and can be biased by baseline educational level and language 23. Therefore, study sample in BLSA, which comprised a more‐uneducated elderly population than previous studies, may contribute to the strong association of MMSE and CVD mortality risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our study also has some limitations. First, the MMSE is a common screening instrument, rather than a clinical assessment, and has limited ability to test executive or visuospatial functions and detect vascular cognitive dysfunction 23. Second, the MMSE includes 10 categories representing different domain items 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of reliability and validity were comparable or higher than those obtained from previous studies [6,7]. Although MMSE has some limitations, it was used to validate RBANS-S over other instruments like MoCA, as it has been repeatedly used in dementia studies, particularly as a "standard" easily communicated and cited tool [8]. MMSE enables results to be compared across many in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%