2017
DOI: 10.16881/jss.2017.10.28.4.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Earthquake Survivors : A Preliminary Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale has been shown to have good internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity in a variety of trauma‐exposed samples (Blevins, Weathers, Davis, Witte, & Domino, 2015; Bovin et al, 2016; Ito, Takebayashi, Suzuki, & Horikoshi, 2019; Kim et al, 2017; Wortmann et al, 2016). In addition, it has been demonstrated that its cutoff scores are optimally efficient for diagnosing PTSD (Bovin et al, 2016; Wortmann et al, 2016), and that it is sensitive to assessing treatment change (Kwon, Yang, You, & Cho, 2017; Wortmann et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale has been shown to have good internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity in a variety of trauma‐exposed samples (Blevins, Weathers, Davis, Witte, & Domino, 2015; Bovin et al, 2016; Ito, Takebayashi, Suzuki, & Horikoshi, 2019; Kim et al, 2017; Wortmann et al, 2016). In addition, it has been demonstrated that its cutoff scores are optimally efficient for diagnosing PTSD (Bovin et al, 2016; Wortmann et al, 2016), and that it is sensitive to assessing treatment change (Kwon, Yang, You, & Cho, 2017; Wortmann et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%