Cognitive behaviour therapy for good and poor prognosis generalized anxiety disorder: a clinical effectiveness study

Durham, Robert C.; Fisher, Peter; Dow, Michael G.; Sharp, Donald; Power, Kevin; Swan, J. Shannon; Morton, R. Victor

doi:10.1002/cpp.405

Cited by 34 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 39 publications

(29 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, trait-anxiety levels were similar to the levels reported by Ost and Breitholtz (2000) and Arntz (2003) in their applied relaxation treatment conditions, and by Borkovec and Costello (1993) in CBT. Furthermore, pretreatment worry scores assessed by the AnTI in the present study were similar to those reported by Durham et al (2004) in their treatment study. Thus, the current sample appears to consist of patients comparable with patients treated in other trials.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 83%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: An open trial

Wells

King²

2006

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

204

122

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 83%

“…Recent attempts to improve treatment have combined these treatment elements, and increased the amount of therapy delivered (e.g. Borkovec, Newman, Pincus, & Lytle, 2002;Durham et al, 2004). However, so far treatment outcomes have not improved.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: An open trial

Wells

King²

2006

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

204

122

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In Trial 7, those patients (identified as having good prognosis) who were allocated to brief CBT had the most favourable outcome, whereas there was no significant difference between the standard CBT and intense CBT groups. 116 It was concluded from this study that patient characteristics are a more powerful influence on outcome than the length of therapy. Finally, in Trial 8, 12 sessions of therapistdelivered CBT were found to be more effective than six sessions of CBT, but not more effective than computer-augmented CBT over six sessions at post-treatment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…117 A full description of the trial method can be found in the original report. 116 In the original trial poor prognosis patients receiving intensive CBT did not fare any better than those receiving standard CBT, whereas the good prognosis patients fared best overall, despite receiving only brief therapy. 118 which incorporated the cognitive and behavioural theories of panic 118,119 and standard cognitive and behavioural techniques.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Long-term outcome of cognitive behaviour therapy clinical trials in central Scotland

Durham

Chambers²,

Power³

et al. 2005

Health Technol Assess

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. NHS libraries can subscribe free of charge. Public libraries can subscribe at a very reduced cost of £100 for each volume (normally comprising 30-40 titles). The commercial subscription rate is £300 per volume. Please see our website for details. Subscriptions can only be purchased for the current or forthcoming volume. Contact details are as follows: Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to Direct Mail Works Ltd and drawn on a bank with a UK address. Paying by credit cardThe following cards are accepted by phone, fax, post or via the website ordering pages: Delta, Eurocard, Mastercard, Solo, Switch and Visa. We advise against sending credit card details in a plain email. Paying by official purchase orderYou can post or fax these, but they must be from public bodies (i.e. NHS or universities) within the UK. We cannot at present accept purchase orders from commercial companies or from outside the UK. How do I get a copy of HTA on CD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd.htm). Or contact Direct Mail Works (see contact details above) by email, post, fax or phone. HTA on CD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA Programme and lists the membership of the various committees. HTA NHS R&D HTA ProgrammeT he research findings from the NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme directly influence key decision-making bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Screening Committee (NSC) who rely on HTA outputs to help raise standards of care. HTA findings also help to improve the quality of the service in the NHS indirectly in that they form a key component of the 'National Knowledge Service' that is being developed to improve the evidence of clinical practice throughout the NHS.The HTA Programme was set up in 1993. Its role is to ensure that high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies is produced in the most efficient way for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined to include all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care, rather than settings of care.The HTA Programme commissions research only on topics where it has identified key gaps in the evidence needed by the NHS. Suggestions for topics are actively sought from people working in the NHS,...

show abstract

“…Borkovec et al, 2002;Yonkers et al, 2000). The CASP index was used in a clinical effectiveness study to test whether or not more intensive CBT (15 versus nine sessions) was more effective with poor prognosis GAD patients (Durham et al, 2004). A comparison group of good prognosis GAD patients (low scores on the CASP) was given brief CBT (five sessions).…”

Section: The Search For Moderating Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%