1999
DOI: 10.1080/028457199440098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive-behavioural Anger Management Training for Adults with Mild Intellectual Disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…() and King et al . (), report the benefits of carer participation and comment that this can help clients apply lessons learned during the intervention process, to real life settings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and King et al . (), report the benefits of carer participation and comment that this can help clients apply lessons learned during the intervention process, to real life settings.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of cognitive techniques as part of this treatment was judged to be ineffective and it is reported that role‐play was the most useful technique used with this group. In another study, King et al (1999) used a similar group treatment package and research design with 11 adults with mild ID residing in community facilities who had been referred because of their anger control problems. Pre‐post treatment outcome measures showed significant treatment gains on a self‐report anger and self‐esteem inventories and these gains were maintained at 12‐week follow‐up.…”
Section: Treatment Of Anger and Aggression For People With Intellectumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One man did not reoffend, but the other did within 9 months. The noncontrolled group studies also showed reductions of aggressive behavior in the short term (King et al., 1999; Rose, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Included in Table 1 are studies in which inferential statistics have been used to determine the significance of changes observed in dependent variables. These studies are described as quasi‐experimental, however, because they have failed to include a control or no‐treatment group (e.g., Albini & Dinitz, 1965; Beail, 1998; Beail & Warden, 1996; Beail, Warden, Morsley, & Newman, 2005; King, Lancaster, Wynne, Nettleton, & Davis 1999).…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation