2016
DOI: 10.1134/s0362119716030038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive brain–Computer interface and probable aspects of its practical application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ivanitsky et.al. figured out an important role of BCI feedback even for mastering complex cognitive tasks [14]. Ideally, a feedback should give a subject sufficient information about his progress, but not distract him from performing the mental task itself, i.e.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ivanitsky et.al. figured out an important role of BCI feedback even for mastering complex cognitive tasks [14]. Ideally, a feedback should give a subject sufficient information about his progress, but not distract him from performing the mental task itself, i.e.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial neural networks, one of the widely used classification algorithms in passive BCI, showed remarkable efficiency (more than 90% accuracy) in recogni tion of mental operations basing on EEG spectral features while solving verbal and spatial tasks (Ivanitsky, 1997;Tarotin et al, 2017;Atanov, Ivanitsky, & Ivanitsky, 2016). Several studies have demonstrated a potential of EEG as an indicator of cognitive workload during training Antonenko & Niederhauser, 2010;Fairclough et al, 2005;Fairclough, Gilleade, Ewing, & Roberts, 2013;Zhu et al, 2010), which is defined as a perceived relationship between existing mental abilities and resources required for mental tasks (Hart & Staveland, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we com bined data from the current and previous datasets in order to study group differ ences in behavioral accuracy and time of task solution between math and humanitarian subjects. For the purpose of EEG classification we used an artificial neuronal network -the perceptron classifier without hidden layers (McCulloch & Pitts, 1943;Pitts & McCulloch, 1947), which was previously successfully imple mented for classification of EEG patterns during solving of verbal and spatial tasks (Ivanitsky, 1997;Atanov et al, 2016;Tarotin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial neural networks, one of the widely used classification algorithms in passive BCI, showed remarkable efficiency (more than 90% accuracy) in recognition of mental operations basing on EEG spectral features while solving verbal and spatial tasks (Ivanitsky, 1997;Tarotin et al, 2017;Atanov, Ivanitsky, & Ivanitsky, 2016). Several studies have demonstrated a potential of EEG as an indicator of cognitive workload during training Antonenko & Niederhauser, 2010;Fairclough et al, 2005;Fairclough, Gilleade, Ewing, & Roberts, 2013;Zhu et al, 2010), which is defined as a perceived relationship between existing mental abilities and resources required for mental tasks (Hart & Staveland, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we combined data from the current and previous datasets in order to study group differences in behavioral accuracy and time of task solution between math and humanitarian subjects. For the purpose of EEG classification we used an artificial neuronal network -the perceptron classifier without hidden layers (McCulloch & Pitts, 1943;Pitts & McCulloch, 1947), which was previously successfully implemented for classification of EEG patterns during solving of verbal and spatial tasks (Ivanitsky, 1997;Atanov et al, 2016;Tarotin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%