2014
DOI: 10.1080/10926771.2014.904466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Control in the Face of Fear: Reduced Cognitive-Emotional Flexibility in Women with a History of Child Abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the sparse literature that has examined maternal PTSD symptoms and parenting in the infancy period, research has suggested that those who were abused in childhood may have cognitive‐affective difficulties that could interfere with caregiving. Research has demonstrated that those with childhood abuse histories are more likely to show heightened attentional and affective (specifically, amygdala) responses to fearful and angry faces, to make negative attributions about the self and others, to have difficulty holding information in mind in the presence of distracting emotional information, and to show impaired top‐down cortical regulation of emotional arousal (Caldwell, Krug, Carter, & Minzenberg, ; Cromheeke, Herpoel, & Mueller, ; Dannlowski et al., ; Glashouwer & De Jong, ; Grant, Cannistraci, Hollon, Gore, & Shelton, ; Hart & Rubia, ; Johnson, Gibb, & McGeary, ). Together, this suggests that individuals with abuse histories are more likely to have disrupted affective responses in the context of emotional signals (e.g., a crying infant) and also may be compromised in their ability to recruit cognitive resources at these times.…”
Section: Experiences Of Childhood Abuse and Maternal Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the sparse literature that has examined maternal PTSD symptoms and parenting in the infancy period, research has suggested that those who were abused in childhood may have cognitive‐affective difficulties that could interfere with caregiving. Research has demonstrated that those with childhood abuse histories are more likely to show heightened attentional and affective (specifically, amygdala) responses to fearful and angry faces, to make negative attributions about the self and others, to have difficulty holding information in mind in the presence of distracting emotional information, and to show impaired top‐down cortical regulation of emotional arousal (Caldwell, Krug, Carter, & Minzenberg, ; Cromheeke, Herpoel, & Mueller, ; Dannlowski et al., ; Glashouwer & De Jong, ; Grant, Cannistraci, Hollon, Gore, & Shelton, ; Hart & Rubia, ; Johnson, Gibb, & McGeary, ). Together, this suggests that individuals with abuse histories are more likely to have disrupted affective responses in the context of emotional signals (e.g., a crying infant) and also may be compromised in their ability to recruit cognitive resources at these times.…”
Section: Experiences Of Childhood Abuse and Maternal Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third possibility that may be difficult to test concerns the lack of clarity among the findings using emotion faces with trauma groups. While there is evidence of atypical emotion face processing, there are conflicting findings as to which emotional displays (e.g., angry, fearful, happy) are more arousing and disruptive to performance (e.g., Caldwell et al, 2014 ; Cromheeke et al, 2014 ). Therefore, had we conducted separate conditions with a range of emotion faces (e.g., happy, fearful, angry, disgust), we may have observed specific indirect effects of a particular emotion face stimuli in this sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the study of maltreatment history, task manipulations that involve replacing neutral stimuli with trauma-relevant, emotionally valenced stimuli may be particularly fruitful. Two research groups manipulated the Stroop task of inhibition and flexibility by introducing threat word stimuli ( Fontenot et al, 2015 ) and emotion face stimuli ( Caldwell et al, 2014 ), finding poorer performance by young adults reporting a history of maltreatment particularly in the heated conditions. Cromheeke et al (2014) administered the Spatial Emotional Match to Sample task, a working memory test heated with the use of neutral and emotion faces, to adult women with differing trauma histories.…”
Section: History Of Child Maltreatment and College Academic Outcomes:mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the plausibility that early childhood experiences may impact attention to emotion in adulthood, if and how early abuse impacts attention bias in adults is currently understudied (Gibb, Schofield, & Coles, 2009;Young & Widom, 2014). A small but emerging literature demonstrates the evidence of attention biases for unpleasant information in cross-sectional samples of adults who report a history of childhood abuse (Caldwell, Krug, Carter, & Minzenberg, 2014;Gibb et al, 2009;Johnson, Gibb, & McGeary, 2010). For example, one study of adults with a childhood abuse history showed evidence of an attention bias toward angry faces (Gibb et al, 2009), while another showed difficulty disengaging from fearful faces (Caldwell et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small but emerging literature demonstrates the evidence of attention biases for unpleasant information in cross-sectional samples of adults who report a history of childhood abuse (Caldwell, Krug, Carter, & Minzenberg, 2014;Gibb et al, 2009;Johnson, Gibb, & McGeary, 2010). For example, one study of adults with a childhood abuse history showed evidence of an attention bias toward angry faces (Gibb et al, 2009), while another showed difficulty disengaging from fearful faces (Caldwell et al, 2014). In addition to attention biases toward unpleasant information, evidence of heightened amygdala activity prompted by emotional stimuli more broadly (i.e., regardless of emotion type, e.g., angry, sad, and happy faces; van Harmelen et al, 2012), reduced attention to emotional and neutral stimuli (Weber et al, 2009), and increased attention toward pleasant (happy faces), but not unpleasant (threatening faces), stimuli (Fani, Bradley-Davino, Ressler, & McClure-Tone, 2011) have emerged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%