2018
DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2018.1489524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive diagnostic model of best choice: a study of reading comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classification accuracy ( P a ) and consistency ( P c ) are two important indicators for evaluating the reliability and validity of classification results. According to Ravand and Robitzsch (2018) , values of at least 0.8 for the P a index and 0.7 for the P c index can be considered acceptable classification rates. As shown in Table 11 , both pattern- and attribute-level classification accuracy and consistency were within the acceptable range.…”
Section: Development Of the Instrument For Longitudinal Learning Diagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification accuracy ( P a ) and consistency ( P c ) are two important indicators for evaluating the reliability and validity of classification results. According to Ravand and Robitzsch (2018) , values of at least 0.8 for the P a index and 0.7 for the P c index can be considered acceptable classification rates. As shown in Table 11 , both pattern- and attribute-level classification accuracy and consistency were within the acceptable range.…”
Section: Development Of the Instrument For Longitudinal Learning Diagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive diagnostic models have primarily been used to serve two main purposes: (a) to classify examinees into similar skill mastery profiles on the basis of their observed response patterns and (b) to identify whether there is a compensatory or noncompensatory interaction between the postulated attributes underlying a given skill (Ravand & Robitzsch, 2018). A wide array of CDMs with different theories or assumptions about the way of interaction between attributes (see Ravand & Baghaei, 2019, for a review) have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, CDMs can provide highly reliable examinee estimates with small sample sizes (Bradshaw & Cohen, 2010). As a rule of thumb, it is suggested that the number of items and sample size should exceed the number of latent classes (e.g., Huebner, 2010;Ravand & Robitzsch, 2018). In this study, there were 16 latent classes which was less than number of items (i.e., 22) and sample size (i.e., 282).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…According to Table 8, Attributes 1 and 3 were estimated at 99% certainty and Attribute 2 and Attribute 4 were estimated at 97% and 96% certainty, respectively. Although there is no systematic investigation on the effect of sample size on CDM classification accuracy, some researchers (e.g., Tatsuoka, 1983;Lei & Li, 2016) stated that CDM classification accuracy increases with the sample size (Ravand & Robitzsch, 2018). On the other hand, CDMs can provide highly reliable examinee estimates with small sample sizes (Bradshaw & Cohen, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%