2014
DOI: 10.7333/1412-0204059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Computerized Adaptive Testing: Two New Item-Selection Methods That Incorporate Response Times

Abstract: A recent paper proposed an item-selection approach for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) in which the psychometric information per time unit is maximized. The current research extended this methodology to adaptive tests combined with use of a cognitive diagnostic model (CDM). Two new item-selection methods are introduced for the combination of CDMs and CAT: posterior-weighted Kullback-Leibler information per-time-unit, and mutual information per-time-unit. These methods were compared with standard procedures… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, MER performance might differ under practical constraints (e.g., item exposure control, test overlap control, or content balancing), so future studies can examine these phenomena. As information technology has enabled recording of response times, they can be incorporated into item selection methods (e.g., Finkelman et al, 2014), so future studies might incorporate response times into MER. As initial item selection can affect CAT efficiency (Xu et al, 2016), future studies can combine MER with optimal initial item selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, MER performance might differ under practical constraints (e.g., item exposure control, test overlap control, or content balancing), so future studies can examine these phenomena. As information technology has enabled recording of response times, they can be incorporated into item selection methods (e.g., Finkelman et al, 2014), so future studies might incorporate response times into MER. As initial item selection can affect CAT efficiency (Xu et al, 2016), future studies can combine MER with optimal initial item selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Example of PhysTCriTS Item Appearance in CAT PhysTCriTS which implements CAT system is able to present the problems (questions) to the students in accordance with their ability as Finkelman et al, (2014) state that the next item will then be different, the difficulty index of the next items will change depending on the previous question answered. In addition, CAT is able to provide quick feedback for both student and teacher.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAT is said to be the most important psychological assessment development. By using CAT, the difficulty index of the next items will change depending on the previous question answered (Finkelman et. al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prevent differential speededness in high-stakes testing situations, this sensitivity of items to working speed is very useful in the test development process. Recently, Finkelman, Kim, Weissman, and Cook (2014) published a paper on item selection for cognitive diagnostic models and CAT in which RTs were taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%